Personal profile
Research interests
I examine how divergent evidence management strategies at the ICTY/IRMCT impact their legitimacy, fair trial and due process and the courts’ ability to disseminate justice?
Contradictions in judicial facts, prevalent in international tribunals, undermine peacebuilding efforts as they instil doubt about what happened and who was responsible for the atrocities. Criminal trials often have colossal evidence bases and raw information records (9.6 million pages at the ICTY) which are almost always confusing/disorganised/chaotic. Different parties to trials develop distinct organisational strategies (workflows) to understand/manage such evidence. My research hypothesises that these divergent strategies of various offices generate contradictory narratives of war. Through archival examination and analysis, as well as computational modelling. I aim to assess the generation and the extent of these divergent narratives and their consequences not only to the historical inquiry but also to justice
Expertise related to UN Sustainable Development Goals
In 2015, UN member states agreed to 17 global Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all. This person’s work contributes towards the following SDG(s):
Education/Academic qualification
MA., International Relations, King's College London
2020 → 2021
LL.M, University of Cambridge
2018 → 2019
BA., LLB (Hons), National University of Juridical Sciences
2013 → 2018
Keywords
- KZ Law of Nations
- International courts
- international human rights law
- Criminal Justice
- International Law
- International Security Studies
- DR Balkan Peninsula
Fingerprint
- 1 Similar Profiles
Prizes
-
King's Research Experience Award
Thipperudraiah, N. (Recipient), 2021
Prize: Prize (including medals and awards)