Search results

• 2019

  Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review

  The SW-CRT Review Group, Hemming, K., Carroll, K., Thompson, J., Forbes, A., Taljaard, M., Dutton, S. J., Madurasinghe, V., Morgan, K., Stuart, B., Fielding, K., Cornelius, V., Turner, E. L., Hooper, R., Giraudeau, B., Seed, P. T., Nickless, A., Grayling, M., Prague, M., Kerry, S., & 31 othersBell, L., Watson, E., Gafoor, R., Marlin, N., Yorganci, E., Smith, L., Mbekwe, M., Teerenstra, S., Chan, C., Moerbeek, M., Jacobsen, P., Bond, S., Jones, B., Preisser, J., Kanaan, M., Hewitt, C., Easter, C., Pellatt-Higgins, T., Pankhurst, L., Agbla, S. C., Eldridge, S., Lerner, R. G., Leyrat, C., Pilling, M., Forman, J. R., Bhattacharya, I., Magill, N., Candlish, J., McDowell, C., Martin, J. & Kristunas, C., 1 Mar 2019, In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 107, p. 77-88 12 p.

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

  Open Access

  File

  • Quality 100%
  • Systematic Review 100%
  • Cluster Randomized Trial 100%
  • Study Design 50%
  • Attention 25%
  8 Citations (Scopus)

  127 Downloads (Pure)