A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court

James Simon Francis Lee

A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court

James Simon Francis Lee

Laws

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

372 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter offers a common law perspective on the binding effect of judicial decisions, using the example of the practice of the United Kingdom Supreme Court with respect to the doctrine of precedent. It is argued that there are distinctive features of the Supreme Court’s adjudicative structures which bear on its decision-making.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Závaznost soudních rozhodnutí – vnitrostátní a mezinárodní náhledy
Editors	Guido Raimondi, Koen Lenaerts, Pavel Šámal
Publisher	Wolters Kluwer
Chapter	10
Pages	143-158
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2018

Access to Document

James Lee - A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions

Cite this

@inbook{5849fb749d13483485925f77d47417a4,

title = "A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court",

abstract = "This chapter offers a common law perspective on the binding effect of judicial decisions, using the example of the practice of the United Kingdom Supreme Court with respect to the doctrine of precedent. It is argued that there are distinctive features of the Supreme Court{\textquoteright}s adjudicative structures which bear on its decision-making.",

author = "Lee, {James Simon Francis}",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

language = "English",

pages = "143--158",

editor = "Guido Raimondi and Koen Lenaerts and Pavel {\v S}{\'a}mal",

booktitle = "Z{\'a}vaznost soudn{\'i}ch rozhodnut{\'i} – vnitrost{\'a}tn{\'i} a mezin{\'a}rodn{\'i} n{\'a}hledy",

publisher = "Wolters Kluwer",

}

A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court. / Lee, James Simon Francis.
Závaznost soudních rozhodnutí – vnitrostátní a mezinárodní náhledy. ed. / Guido Raimondi; Koen Lenaerts; Pavel Šámal. Wolters Kluwer, 2018. p. 143-158.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court

AU - Lee, James Simon Francis

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

N2 - This chapter offers a common law perspective on the binding effect of judicial decisions, using the example of the practice of the United Kingdom Supreme Court with respect to the doctrine of precedent. It is argued that there are distinctive features of the Supreme Court’s adjudicative structures which bear on its decision-making.

AB - This chapter offers a common law perspective on the binding effect of judicial decisions, using the example of the practice of the United Kingdom Supreme Court with respect to the doctrine of precedent. It is argued that there are distinctive features of the Supreme Court’s adjudicative structures which bear on its decision-making.

M3 - Chapter

SP - 143

EP - 158

BT - Závaznost soudních rozhodnutí – vnitrostátní a mezinárodní náhledy

A2 - Raimondi, Guido

A2 - Lenaerts, Koen

A2 - Šámal, Pavel

PB - Wolters Kluwer

ER -

A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this