A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

211 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This chapter offers a common law perspective on the binding effect of judicial decisions, using the example of the practice of the United Kingdom Supreme Court with respect to the doctrine of precedent. It is argued that there are distinctive features of the Supreme Court’s adjudicative structures which bear on its decision-making.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationZávaznost soudních rozhodnutí – vnitrostátní a mezinárodní náhledy
EditorsGuido Raimondi, Koen Lenaerts, Pavel Šámal
PublisherWolters Kluwer
Chapter10
Pages143-158
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Common Law Perspective on the Binding Effect of Judicial Decisions: Reasoning with Precedent in the United Kingdom Supreme Court'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this