A comparative study of practitioner perceptions of selection methods in the United Kingdom

Duncan J. R. Jackson; Chris Dewberry; Jaroslava Gallagher; Liam Close

doi:10.1111/joop.12187

A comparative study of practitioner perceptions of selection methods in the United Kingdom

Duncan J. R. Jackson, Chris Dewberry, Jaroslava Gallagher, Liam Close

Arctic Shores Ltd

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

256 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this study, 476 participants, divided into occupational psychology (OP)‐, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)‐, human resource management (HRM)‐qualified, and layperson subgroups, provided their perceptions of the validity, fairness, and frequency of use of employee selection methods. Results of a mixed‐effects analysis of covariance revealed that respondent qualification background predicted the degree to which participant validity perceptions were aligned with research‐based estimates of validity, F [3, 29.39] = 20.06, p < .001, η2 = .67. Corrected pairwise comparisons suggested that perceptions of participants with CIPD and HRM backgrounds were not significantly more aligned with research estimates of validity than were the perceptions of laypeople. OP participant validity perceptions were significantly more aligned with research estimates than all other subgroups, (p < .03). Evidence was also found for some between‐group consistency regarding frequency‐of‐use perceptions, but less between‐group consistency was found vis‐à‐vis perceptions of fairness. Implications for decision‐making in employee selection are discussed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	33-56
Journal	JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume	91
Issue number	1
Early online date	23 Aug 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12187
Publication status	Published - 1 Mar 2018

Access to Document

10.1111/joop.12187

A comparative study of practitioner perceptions of selection_JACKSON_Published23August2017_GREEN AAMAccepted author manuscript, 738 KB

http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/19147/

Cite this

@article{2ccef6b07e144878a5fdf77e2faf6a77,

title = "A comparative study of practitioner perceptions of selection methods in the United Kingdom",

abstract = "In this study, 476 participants, divided into occupational psychology (OP)‐, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)‐, human resource management (HRM)‐qualified, and layperson subgroups, provided their perceptions of the validity, fairness, and frequency of use of employee selection methods. Results of a mixed‐effects analysis of covariance revealed that respondent qualification background predicted the degree to which participant validity perceptions were aligned with research‐based estimates of validity, F [3, 29.39] = 20.06, p < .001, η2 = .67. Corrected pairwise comparisons suggested that perceptions of participants with CIPD and HRM backgrounds were not significantly more aligned with research estimates of validity than were the perceptions of laypeople. OP participant validity perceptions were significantly more aligned with research estimates than all other subgroups, (p < .03). Evidence was also found for some between‐group consistency regarding frequency‐of‐use perceptions, but less between‐group consistency was found vis‐{\`a}‐vis perceptions of fairness. Implications for decision‐making in employee selection are discussed.",

author = "Jackson, {Duncan J. R.} and Chris Dewberry and Jaroslava Gallagher and Liam Close",

year = "2018",

month = mar,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1111/joop.12187",

language = "English",

volume = "91",

pages = "33--56",

journal = "JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY",

issn = "0963-1798",

publisher = "BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOC",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative study of practitioner perceptions of selection methods in the United Kingdom

AU - Jackson, Duncan J. R.

AU - Dewberry, Chris

AU - Gallagher, Jaroslava

AU - Close, Liam

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - In this study, 476 participants, divided into occupational psychology (OP)‐, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)‐, human resource management (HRM)‐qualified, and layperson subgroups, provided their perceptions of the validity, fairness, and frequency of use of employee selection methods. Results of a mixed‐effects analysis of covariance revealed that respondent qualification background predicted the degree to which participant validity perceptions were aligned with research‐based estimates of validity, F [3, 29.39] = 20.06, p < .001, η2 = .67. Corrected pairwise comparisons suggested that perceptions of participants with CIPD and HRM backgrounds were not significantly more aligned with research estimates of validity than were the perceptions of laypeople. OP participant validity perceptions were significantly more aligned with research estimates than all other subgroups, (p < .03). Evidence was also found for some between‐group consistency regarding frequency‐of‐use perceptions, but less between‐group consistency was found vis‐à‐vis perceptions of fairness. Implications for decision‐making in employee selection are discussed.

AB - In this study, 476 participants, divided into occupational psychology (OP)‐, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD)‐, human resource management (HRM)‐qualified, and layperson subgroups, provided their perceptions of the validity, fairness, and frequency of use of employee selection methods. Results of a mixed‐effects analysis of covariance revealed that respondent qualification background predicted the degree to which participant validity perceptions were aligned with research‐based estimates of validity, F [3, 29.39] = 20.06, p < .001, η2 = .67. Corrected pairwise comparisons suggested that perceptions of participants with CIPD and HRM backgrounds were not significantly more aligned with research estimates of validity than were the perceptions of laypeople. OP participant validity perceptions were significantly more aligned with research estimates than all other subgroups, (p < .03). Evidence was also found for some between‐group consistency regarding frequency‐of‐use perceptions, but less between‐group consistency was found vis‐à‐vis perceptions of fairness. Implications for decision‐making in employee selection are discussed.

U2 - 10.1111/joop.12187

DO - 10.1111/joop.12187

M3 - Article

SN - 0963-1798

VL - 91

SP - 33

EP - 56

JO - JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

JF - JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY

IS - 1

ER -

A comparative study of practitioner perceptions of selection methods in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this