King's College London

Research portal

A critical review of advance directives in Germany: attitudes, use and healthcare professionals' compliance

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Natalie Evans, Claudia Bausewein, Arantza Meñaca, Erin V W Andrew, Irene J Higginson, Richard Harding, Robert Pool, Marjolein Gysels, Project PRISMA

Original languageEnglish
Article numberN/A
Pages (from-to)277-288
Number of pages12
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
PublishedJun 2012

King's Authors

Abstract

Objective
Recent legal changes in Germany make non-compliance with advance directives (ADs) a criminal offence. This article assesses the evidence on attitudes towards, use of, and physician compliance with ADs in Germany.

Methods
Critical review: studies on ADs, identified from a systematic review of culture and end-of-life care in Germany (11 electronic databases, 3 journals, reference lists, and grey literature), were included. An interpretative synthesis of findings revealed cross-cutting themes.

Results
Thirty-two studies (1996–2009) were identified. Key themes were: awareness; utilization; compliance; and bindingness of ADs. There was a positive trend between awareness of ADs and study publication date. Use varied between patient groups (0.3–62%) and was low amongst the general population (2.5–10%). Fears about ADs’ purpose and possible abuse were identified. Physician discomfort in discussing ADs and non-compliance were reported. Physicians preferred legally binding ADs, though conflicting results were reported for patients’ desired level of bindingness.

Conclusion
Although there is increasing awareness of ADs in Germany, there remains low use, poor communication, fears of abuse, some non-compliance and contradictory evidence regarding desired bindingness.

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454