A crossover trial investigating the atmospheric content of improvised respirators

Paul Greig, Clarissa Carvalho, Suneil Ramessur, Jan Schumacher, Kariem El-Boghdadly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Abstract Introduction This study was designed to determine the respiratory safety of improvised respirators based on modified full-face snorkel masks, making comparisons with a purpose-designed mask Methods This is a prospective crossover study conducted on ten recruits. Volunteers wore snorkel masks mated to an anaesthetic heat and moisture exchange filter. The system was worn at rest then during exercise. Gases were sampled from the mask at 5-minute intervals. Results The modified snorkel was satisfactory in seven participants. For three carbon dioxide concentrations were >1%. Two participants exposed to excessive CO2 also experienced oxygen concentrations <19%. All participants exposed to unsatisfactory gas mixtures were non-white. Conclusions Modifying snorkel masks changes the way that gases circulate through the system. These modifications increase the risk of rebreathing in some users, which may yield an unsafe gas mixture. These improvised masks cannot be recommended as a substitute for purpose-designed equipment.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the Intensive Care Society
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • PPE, RPE, COVID-19

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A crossover trial investigating the atmospheric content of improvised respirators'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this