A formalisation and prototype implementation of argumentation for statistical model selection

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
170 Downloads (Pure)


The task of data collection is becoming routine in many disciplines and this results in increased availability of data. This routinely collected data provides a valuable opportunity for analysis with a view to support evidence based decision making. In order to confidently leverage the data in support of decision making the most appropriate statistical method needs to be selected, and this can be difficult for an end user not trained in statistics. This paper outlines an application of argumentation to support the analysis of clinical data, that uses Extended Argumentation Frameworks in order to reason with the meta-level arguments derived from preference contexts relevant to the data and the analysis objective of the end user. We outline a formalisation of the argument scheme for statistical model selection, its critical questions and the structure of the knowledge base required to support the instantiation of the arguments and meta-level arguments through the use of Z notation. This paper also describes the prototype implementation of argumentation for statistical model selection based on the Z specification outlined herein.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)83-103
JournalArgument & Computation
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2018

Cite this