A Framework for the Evaluation of Measurement-based Timing Analyses

Benjamin Lesage, David Griffin, Frank Soboczenski, Iain Bate, Robert Davies

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A key issue with Worst-Case Execution Time (WCET) analyses is the evaluation of the tightness and soundness of the results produced. In the absence of a ground truth, i.e. the Actual WCET (AWCET), such evaluations rely on comparison between different estimates or observed values.

In this paper, we introduce a framework for the evaluation of measurement-based timing analyses. This framework uses abstract models of synthetic tasks to provide realistic execution time data as input to the analyses, while ensuring that a corresponding AWCET can be computed. The effectiveness of the framework is demonstrated by evaluating the impact of imperfect structural coverage on an existing measurement-based probabilistic timing analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Real Time and Networks Systems - RTNS ’15
Pages35-44
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Framework for the Evaluation of Measurement-based Timing Analyses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this