A general framework for selecting workparticipation outcomes in intervention studies among persons with health problems: a concept paper

Margarita Ravinskaya; Jos H. Verbeek; Miranda W. Langendam; Ira Madan; Suzanne M M Verstappen; Regina Kunz; Carel T.J. Hulshof; Jan L. Hoving

doi:10.1186/s12889-022-14564-0

A general framework for selecting workparticipation outcomes in intervention studies among persons with health problems: a concept paper

Margarita Ravinskaya, Jos H. Verbeek, Miranda W. Langendam, Ira Madan, Suzanne M M Verstappen, Regina Kunz, Carel T.J. Hulshof, Jan L. Hoving

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Work participation is important for health and can be considered as engagement in a major area of life which is of significance for most people, but it can also be thought of as fulfilling or discharging a role. Currently, academic research lacks a comprehensive classification of work participation outcomes. The International Classification of Functioning is the foremost model in defining work functioning and its counterpart work disability, but it does not provide a critical (core) set of outcomes. Standardizing the definitions and nomenclature used in the research of work participation would ensure that the outcomes of studies are comparable, and practitioners and guideline developers can better decide what works best. As work participation is a broad umbrella term including outcome categories which need unambiguous differentiation, a framework needs to be developed first. Aim: To propose a framework which can be used to develop a generic core outcome set for work participation. Methods: First, we performed a systematic literature search on the concept of (work) participation, views on how to measure it, and on existing classifications for outcome measurements. Next, we derived criteria for the framework and proposed a framework based on the criteria. Last, we applied the framework to six case studies as a proof of concept. Results: Our literature search provided 2106 hits and we selected 59 studies for full-text analysis. Based on the literature and the developed criteria we propose four overarching outcome categories: (1) initiating employment, (2) having employment, (3) increasing or maintaining productivity at work, and (4) return to employment. These categories appeared feasible in our proof-of-concept assessment with six different case studies. Conclusion: We propose to use the framework for work participation outcomes to develop a core outcome set for intervention studies to improve work participation.

Original language	English
Article number	2189
Journal	BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume	22
Issue number	2189
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14564-0
Publication status	Published - 26 Nov 2022

Access to Document

10.1186/s12889-022-14564-0

Cite this

@article{1990266032d94f4296310fb0675c742c,

title = "A general framework for selecting workparticipation outcomes in intervention studies among persons with health problems: a concept paper",

abstract = "Background: Work participation is important for health and can be considered as engagement in a major area of life which is of significance for most people, but it can also be thought of as fulfilling or discharging a role. Currently, academic research lacks a comprehensive classification of work participation outcomes. The International Classification of Functioning is the foremost model in defining work functioning and its counterpart work disability, but it does not provide a critical (core) set of outcomes. Standardizing the definitions and nomenclature used in the research of work participation would ensure that the outcomes of studies are comparable, and practitioners and guideline developers can better decide what works best. As work participation is a broad umbrella term including outcome categories which need unambiguous differentiation, a framework needs to be developed first. Aim: To propose a framework which can be used to develop a generic core outcome set for work participation. Methods: First, we performed a systematic literature search on the concept of (work) participation, views on how to measure it, and on existing classifications for outcome measurements. Next, we derived criteria for the framework and proposed a framework based on the criteria. Last, we applied the framework to six case studies as a proof of concept. Results: Our literature search provided 2106 hits and we selected 59 studies for full-text analysis. Based on the literature and the developed criteria we propose four overarching outcome categories: (1) initiating employment, (2) having employment, (3) increasing or maintaining productivity at work, and (4) return to employment. These categories appeared feasible in our proof-of-concept assessment with six different case studies. Conclusion: We propose to use the framework for work participation outcomes to develop a core outcome set for intervention studies to improve work participation.",

author = "Margarita Ravinskaya and Verbeek, {Jos H.} and Langendam, {Miranda W.} and Ira Madan and Verstappen, {Suzanne M M} and Regina Kunz and Hulshof, {Carel T.J.} and Hoving, {Jan L.}",

note = "Funding Information: SV is supported by Versus Arthritis (grant numbers 20385, 20380) and the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",

year = "2022",

month = nov,

day = "26",

doi = "10.1186/s12889-022-14564-0",

language = "English",

volume = "22",

journal = "BMC PUBLIC HEALTH",

issn = "1471-2458",

publisher = "BMC Health Services Research",

number = "2189",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A general framework for selecting workparticipation outcomes in intervention studies among persons with health problems: a concept paper

AU - Ravinskaya, Margarita

AU - Verbeek, Jos H.

AU - Langendam, Miranda W.

AU - Madan, Ira

AU - Verstappen, Suzanne M M

AU - Kunz, Regina

AU - Hulshof, Carel T.J.

AU - Hoving, Jan L.

PY - 2022/11/26

Y1 - 2022/11/26

N2 - Background: Work participation is important for health and can be considered as engagement in a major area of life which is of significance for most people, but it can also be thought of as fulfilling or discharging a role. Currently, academic research lacks a comprehensive classification of work participation outcomes. The International Classification of Functioning is the foremost model in defining work functioning and its counterpart work disability, but it does not provide a critical (core) set of outcomes. Standardizing the definitions and nomenclature used in the research of work participation would ensure that the outcomes of studies are comparable, and practitioners and guideline developers can better decide what works best. As work participation is a broad umbrella term including outcome categories which need unambiguous differentiation, a framework needs to be developed first. Aim: To propose a framework which can be used to develop a generic core outcome set for work participation. Methods: First, we performed a systematic literature search on the concept of (work) participation, views on how to measure it, and on existing classifications for outcome measurements. Next, we derived criteria for the framework and proposed a framework based on the criteria. Last, we applied the framework to six case studies as a proof of concept. Results: Our literature search provided 2106 hits and we selected 59 studies for full-text analysis. Based on the literature and the developed criteria we propose four overarching outcome categories: (1) initiating employment, (2) having employment, (3) increasing or maintaining productivity at work, and (4) return to employment. These categories appeared feasible in our proof-of-concept assessment with six different case studies. Conclusion: We propose to use the framework for work participation outcomes to develop a core outcome set for intervention studies to improve work participation.

AB - Background: Work participation is important for health and can be considered as engagement in a major area of life which is of significance for most people, but it can also be thought of as fulfilling or discharging a role. Currently, academic research lacks a comprehensive classification of work participation outcomes. The International Classification of Functioning is the foremost model in defining work functioning and its counterpart work disability, but it does not provide a critical (core) set of outcomes. Standardizing the definitions and nomenclature used in the research of work participation would ensure that the outcomes of studies are comparable, and practitioners and guideline developers can better decide what works best. As work participation is a broad umbrella term including outcome categories which need unambiguous differentiation, a framework needs to be developed first. Aim: To propose a framework which can be used to develop a generic core outcome set for work participation. Methods: First, we performed a systematic literature search on the concept of (work) participation, views on how to measure it, and on existing classifications for outcome measurements. Next, we derived criteria for the framework and proposed a framework based on the criteria. Last, we applied the framework to six case studies as a proof of concept. Results: Our literature search provided 2106 hits and we selected 59 studies for full-text analysis. Based on the literature and the developed criteria we propose four overarching outcome categories: (1) initiating employment, (2) having employment, (3) increasing or maintaining productivity at work, and (4) return to employment. These categories appeared feasible in our proof-of-concept assessment with six different case studies. Conclusion: We propose to use the framework for work participation outcomes to develop a core outcome set for intervention studies to improve work participation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142507863&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12889-022-14564-0

DO - 10.1186/s12889-022-14564-0

M3 - Article

SN - 1471-2458

VL - 22

JO - BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

JF - BMC PUBLIC HEALTH

IS - 2189

M1 - 2189

ER -

A general framework for selecting workparticipation outcomes in intervention studies among persons with health problems: a concept paper

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this