TY - JOUR
T1 - A global review of ecological fiscal transfers
AU - Busch, Jonah
AU - Ring, Irene
AU - Akullo, Monique
AU - Amarjargal, Oyut
AU - Borie, Maud
AU - Cassola, Rodrigo S.
AU - Cruz-Trinidad, Annabelle
AU - Droste, Nils
AU - Haryanto, Joko Tri
AU - Kasymov, Ulan
AU - Kotenko, Nataliia Viktorivna
AU - Lhkagvadorj, Ariunaa
AU - De Paulo, Felipe Luiz Lima
AU - May, Peter H.
AU - Mukherjee, Anit
AU - Mumbunan, Sonny
AU - Santos, Rui
AU - Tacconi, Luca
AU - Verde Selva, Gracie
AU - Verma, Madhu
AU - Wang, Xiaoxi
AU - Yu, Lu
AU - Zhou, Kecen
N1 - Funding Information:
This Review is the result of an international online workshop on EFT hosted by the Earth Innovation Institute and Technische Universität Dresden on 21–24 September 2020. G. Lima provided helpful input on data analysis for Brazil. J.B. and O.A. are grateful for funding from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. R.S. acknowledges that CENSE is funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (project number UIDB/04085/2020).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Springer Nature Limited.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Ecological fiscal transfers (EFT) transfer public revenue between governments within a country based on ecological indicators. EFT can compensate subnational governments for the costs of conserving ecosystems and in principle can incentivize greater ecological conservation. We review established EFT in Brazil, Portugal, France, China and India, and emerging or proposed EFT in ten more countries. We analyse common themes related to EFT emergence, design and effects. EFT have grown rapidly from US$0.35 billion yr−1 in 2007 to US$23 billion yr−1 in 2020. We discuss the scope of opportunity to expand EFT to other countries by ‘greening’ intergovernmental fiscal transfers.
AB - Ecological fiscal transfers (EFT) transfer public revenue between governments within a country based on ecological indicators. EFT can compensate subnational governments for the costs of conserving ecosystems and in principle can incentivize greater ecological conservation. We review established EFT in Brazil, Portugal, France, China and India, and emerging or proposed EFT in ten more countries. We analyse common themes related to EFT emergence, design and effects. EFT have grown rapidly from US$0.35 billion yr−1 in 2007 to US$23 billion yr−1 in 2020. We discuss the scope of opportunity to expand EFT to other countries by ‘greening’ intergovernmental fiscal transfers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108434136&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0
DO - 10.1038/s41893-021-00728-0
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85108434136
SN - 2398-9629
VL - 4
SP - 756
EP - 765
JO - Nature Sustainability
JF - Nature Sustainability
IS - 9
ER -