A Metacognitive model of procrastination

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Metacognitive model of procrastination

AU - Fernie, Bruce A.

AU - Bharucha, Zinnia

AU - Nikčević, Ana V.

AU - Marino, Claudia

AU - Spada, Marcantonio M.

PY - 2017/3/1

Y1 - 2017/3/1

N2 - Background procrastination refers to the delay or postponement of task or decision-making initiation or completion and is often conceptualised as a failure of self-regulation. Recent research has suggested that metacognitions play a role in procrastination and that unintentional procrastination (UP), as opposed to intentional procrastination (IP), may be the most problematic form of this behaviour. We aimed to test a metacognitive model of procrastination that was grounded in the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model. Methods a convenience sample of 400 participants were recruited and completed (at least partially) a battery of online questionnaires that measured IP and UP, metacognitions about procrastination, depression, and Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS) configurations. Initially, we tested series of hypotheses to establish the relationships between the experimental variables and to test whether CAS configurations would independently predict UP when controlling for age, depression, IP, metacognitions about procrastination, and whether an individual reported that they had been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Results CAS configurations, depression, and metacognitions independently predicted UP. Additionally, path analysis revealed that the study data was an excellent fit to the proposed metacognitive model of procrastination. Limitations the study is cross-sectional. Conclusions the metacognitive model of procrastination presented in this paper can be used to generate novel interventions to treat this problematic behaviour.

AB - Background procrastination refers to the delay or postponement of task or decision-making initiation or completion and is often conceptualised as a failure of self-regulation. Recent research has suggested that metacognitions play a role in procrastination and that unintentional procrastination (UP), as opposed to intentional procrastination (IP), may be the most problematic form of this behaviour. We aimed to test a metacognitive model of procrastination that was grounded in the Self-Regulatory Executive Function model. Methods a convenience sample of 400 participants were recruited and completed (at least partially) a battery of online questionnaires that measured IP and UP, metacognitions about procrastination, depression, and Cognitive Attentional Syndrome (CAS) configurations. Initially, we tested series of hypotheses to establish the relationships between the experimental variables and to test whether CAS configurations would independently predict UP when controlling for age, depression, IP, metacognitions about procrastination, and whether an individual reported that they had been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder. Results CAS configurations, depression, and metacognitions independently predicted UP. Additionally, path analysis revealed that the study data was an excellent fit to the proposed metacognitive model of procrastination. Limitations the study is cross-sectional. Conclusions the metacognitive model of procrastination presented in this paper can be used to generate novel interventions to treat this problematic behaviour.

KW - Metacognition

KW - Metacognitive model of procrastination

KW - Metacognitive Therapy

KW - Procrastination

KW - Self-Regulatory Executive Function model

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007536610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.042

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.042

M3 - Article

SN - 0165-0327

VL - 210

SP - 196

EP - 203

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

ER -