A Mixed Methods Analysis of the Perceptions of the Media by Members of the British Forces during the Iraq War

Richard J. Pinder; Dominic Murphy; Stephani L. Hatch; Amy Iversen; Christopher Dandeker; Simon Wessely

doi:10.1177/0095327X08330818

A Mixed Methods Analysis of the Perceptions of the Media by Members of the British Forces during the Iraq War

Richard J. Pinder, Dominic Murphy, Stephani L. Hatch, Amy Iversen, Christopher Dandeker, Simon Wessely

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Little is known about service personnel's perceptions of the media's coverage of war and its impact on the personnel and their families. Using data collected from a major cohort study of the British Armed Forces, this article examines perceptions of the coverage of the Iraq War among British personnel deployed during the 2003 invasion of Iraq (Operation Telic 1). It draws on the theories of media's effects and gauges whether hostile media effect or assimilation bias effect takes precedence. The authors qualitatively analyzed the responses of 200 military personnel regarding their perceptions of the media and supplemented this by further quantitative analysis. This led the authors to identify concerns that the media coverage was unsuitable, inaccurate, and too immediate; however, in some cases, coverage was considered beneficial. The importance of the family to those deployed and the extent to which media coverage can affect morale make the military family an important media audience.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	131 - 152
Number of pages	22
Journal	Armed Forces and Society
Volume	36
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0095327X08330818
Publication status	Published - Oct 2009

Access to Document

10.1177/0095327X08330818

Cite this

@article{13221f0a37154dc2b3e0e9c41f492e60,

title = "A Mixed Methods Analysis of the Perceptions of the Media by Members of the British Forces during the Iraq War",

abstract = "Little is known about service personnel's perceptions of the media's coverage of war and its impact on the personnel and their families. Using data collected from a major cohort study of the British Armed Forces, this article examines perceptions of the coverage of the Iraq War among British personnel deployed during the 2003 invasion of Iraq (Operation Telic 1). It draws on the theories of media's effects and gauges whether hostile media effect or assimilation bias effect takes precedence. The authors qualitatively analyzed the responses of 200 military personnel regarding their perceptions of the media and supplemented this by further quantitative analysis. This led the authors to identify concerns that the media coverage was unsuitable, inaccurate, and too immediate; however, in some cases, coverage was considered beneficial. The importance of the family to those deployed and the extent to which media coverage can affect morale make the military family an important media audience.",

author = "Pinder, {Richard J.} and Dominic Murphy and Hatch, {Stephani L.} and Amy Iversen and Christopher Dandeker and Simon Wessely",

year = "2009",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1177/0095327X08330818",

language = "English",

volume = "36",

pages = "131 -- 152",

journal = "Armed Forces and Society",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Mixed Methods Analysis of the Perceptions of the Media by Members of the British Forces during the Iraq War

AU - Pinder, Richard J.

AU - Murphy, Dominic

AU - Hatch, Stephani L.

AU - Iversen, Amy

AU - Dandeker, Christopher

AU - Wessely, Simon

PY - 2009/10

Y1 - 2009/10

N2 - Little is known about service personnel's perceptions of the media's coverage of war and its impact on the personnel and their families. Using data collected from a major cohort study of the British Armed Forces, this article examines perceptions of the coverage of the Iraq War among British personnel deployed during the 2003 invasion of Iraq (Operation Telic 1). It draws on the theories of media's effects and gauges whether hostile media effect or assimilation bias effect takes precedence. The authors qualitatively analyzed the responses of 200 military personnel regarding their perceptions of the media and supplemented this by further quantitative analysis. This led the authors to identify concerns that the media coverage was unsuitable, inaccurate, and too immediate; however, in some cases, coverage was considered beneficial. The importance of the family to those deployed and the extent to which media coverage can affect morale make the military family an important media audience.

AB - Little is known about service personnel's perceptions of the media's coverage of war and its impact on the personnel and their families. Using data collected from a major cohort study of the British Armed Forces, this article examines perceptions of the coverage of the Iraq War among British personnel deployed during the 2003 invasion of Iraq (Operation Telic 1). It draws on the theories of media's effects and gauges whether hostile media effect or assimilation bias effect takes precedence. The authors qualitatively analyzed the responses of 200 military personnel regarding their perceptions of the media and supplemented this by further quantitative analysis. This led the authors to identify concerns that the media coverage was unsuitable, inaccurate, and too immediate; however, in some cases, coverage was considered beneficial. The importance of the family to those deployed and the extent to which media coverage can affect morale make the military family an important media audience.

U2 - 10.1177/0095327X08330818

DO - 10.1177/0095327X08330818

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 131

EP - 152

JO - Armed Forces and Society

JF - Armed Forces and Society

IS - 1

ER -

A Mixed Methods Analysis of the Perceptions of the Media by Members of the British Forces during the Iraq War

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this