King's College London

Research portal

A modified echocardiographic approach improves reliability of superior vena caval flow quantification

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Benjamim Ficial, Elena Bonafiglia, Ezio M. Padovani, Maria A. Prioli, Anna E. Finnemore, David J. Cox, Kathryn M. Broadhouse, Anthony N. Price, Giuliana Durighel, Alan M. Groves

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)F7-F11
JournalADC Fetal & Neonatal
Issue number1
Published1 Jan 2017

King's Authors


Objective: To assess accuracy and repeatability of a modified echocardiographic approach to quantify superior vena cava (SVC) flow volume that uses a short-axis view to directly measure SVC area and a suprasternal view to measure flow velocity, both at the level of the right pulmonary artery. Setting: Three tertiary-level neonatal intensive care units. Design: This was a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Accuracy of the traditional and modified approach was first assessed by comparing echo measurements according to both techniques with Phase contrast MRI (PCMRI) assessments, in a cohort of 10 neonates. In a second cohort of 40 neonates, intraobserver scan-rescan repeatability and interobserver analysis-reanalysis repeatability were assessed by repeated SVC flow echo measurements, according to both techniques. Results: The traditional echocardiographic approach to assessment of SVC flow had a moderate agreement with PCMRI (r2 0.259), a scan-rescan intraobserver repeatability index (RI) of 37% (limits of agreement (LOA) -47/+51 mL/kg/min) and an interobserver analysis-reanalysis RI of 31% (LOA -38/+40 mL/kg/min). The modified approach showed a stronger agreement with PCMRI (r2 0.775), an improved intraobserver scan-rescan repeatability (RI 22%, LOA -24/+18 mL/kg/min) and improved interobserver analysis-reanalysis repeatability (RI 18%, LOA -18/+20 mL/kg/min). Conclusions: Echocardiographic assessment of SVC flow volume by tracing area from a short-axis view and measuring velocity-time integral from a suprasternal view offered an improvement in accuracy and repeatability, building on the traditional approach previously described.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454