Abstract
This analysis addresses whether US strategy has escalated the ongoing conflict in Colombia. The study examines the ways in which US policy towards Colombia has been affected both by global circumstances after 9/11, and local events on the ground such as the involvement of private military firms which operate alongside multinational corporations in the country. The evidence suggests that US strategy has escalated the conflict, sometimes unintentionally, as the policy has evolved from an initial emphasis on countering the narcotics trade to one of counterterrorism. This has occurred, however, at the expense of other reforms, in particular by hindering the implementation of an effective pacification strategy. The analysis concludes that such an unbalanced strategy does not, as a consequence, provide for greater security and stability.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 163-196 |
Number of pages | 33 |
Journal | Small Wars and Insurgencies |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2006 |
Keywords
- Counternarcotics
- Counterterrorism
- Terrorism
- Colombia
- COIN
- FARC