A randomised, controlled, observer-masked trial of corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in children: The KERALINK protocol

Kashfia Chowdhury, Caroline Dore, Jennifer M. Burr, Catey Bunce, Mathew Raynor, Matthew Edwards, Daniel F.P. Larkin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction The KERALINK trial tests the hypothesis that corneal cross-linking (CXL) treatment reduces the progression of keratoconus in comparison to standard care in patients under 17 years old. KERALINK is a randomised controlled, observer-masked, multicentre trial in progressive keratoconus comparing epithelium-off CXL with standard care, including spectacles or contact lenses as necessary for best-corrected acuity. Methods and analysis A total of 30 participants will be randomised per group. Eligible participants aged 10–16 years with progressive keratoconus in one or both eyes will be recruited. Following randomisation, participants will be followed up 3-monthly for 18 months. The effect on progression will be determined by K2 on corneal topography. The primary outcome measure is between-group difference in K2 at 18 months adjusted for K2 at baseline examination. Secondary outcomes are the effect of CXL on (1) keratoconus progression, (2) time to keratoconus progression, (3) visual acuity, (4) refraction, (5) apical corneal thickness and (6) adverse events. Patient-reported effects will be explored by questionnaires. Ethics and dissemination Research Ethics Committee Approval was obtained on 30 June 2016 (ref: 14/LO/1937). Current protocol: V.5.0 (08/11/2017). Study findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere028761
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A randomised, controlled, observer-masked trial of corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus in children: The KERALINK protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this