Abstract
Objective
Prognosis for oralcancer is substantially improved when diagnosed early. This research aimed to evaluate an intervention to promote earlypresentation of oralcancer.
Methods
Participants were randomly assigned to a leaflet group (n = 42), a one-to-one group (n = 46) or a control group (n = 24). Participants in the leaflet group read a theory-based (Extended Self-Regulatory Model; Social Cognitive Theory) leaflet on how to spot oralcancerearly. Those in the one-to-one group received a brief, interactional discussion on earlypresentation of oralcancer and were then asked to read the leaflet. Participants in the control group received no information about oralcancer.
Results
The leaflet and the one-to-one instruction led to more accurate knowledge of oralcancer, decreased anticipated delay, and increased understanding, likelihood and confidence to perform self-examination. Neither intervention raised participants’ anxiety. There were minimal differences between the two interventions, yet both were superior to the control group.
Conclusion
This piloting indicates the initial effectiveness of an brief intervention purposefully designed for people at risk of developing oralcancer.
Practice implication
A low cost intervention may be a useful tool to encourageearly detection of oralcancer. This could be embedded into routine consultations or an early detection programme
Prognosis for oralcancer is substantially improved when diagnosed early. This research aimed to evaluate an intervention to promote earlypresentation of oralcancer.
Methods
Participants were randomly assigned to a leaflet group (n = 42), a one-to-one group (n = 46) or a control group (n = 24). Participants in the leaflet group read a theory-based (Extended Self-Regulatory Model; Social Cognitive Theory) leaflet on how to spot oralcancerearly. Those in the one-to-one group received a brief, interactional discussion on earlypresentation of oralcancer and were then asked to read the leaflet. Participants in the control group received no information about oralcancer.
Results
The leaflet and the one-to-one instruction led to more accurate knowledge of oralcancer, decreased anticipated delay, and increased understanding, likelihood and confidence to perform self-examination. Neither intervention raised participants’ anxiety. There were minimal differences between the two interventions, yet both were superior to the control group.
Conclusion
This piloting indicates the initial effectiveness of an brief intervention purposefully designed for people at risk of developing oralcancer.
Practice implication
A low cost intervention may be a useful tool to encourageearly detection of oralcancer. This could be embedded into routine consultations or an early detection programme
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 241-248 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Patient Education and Counseling |
Volume | 88 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2011 |
Keywords
- Oralcancer; Early detection; One-to-one; Leaflet; Self-regulatory model; Social Cognitive Theory