A reappraisal and revision of the numbering of the pharyngeal arches

Anthony Graham; Subathra Poopalasundaram; Victoria Shone; Clemens Kiecker

doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13067

A reappraisal and revision of the numbering of the pharyngeal arches

Anthony Graham^*, Subathra Poopalasundaram, Victoria Shone, Clemens Kiecker

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The pharyngeal arches are a prominent and significant feature of vertebrate embryos. These are visible as a series of bulges on the lateral surface of the embryonic head. In humans, and other amniotes, there are five pharyngeal arches numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6; note the missing ‘5’. This is the standard scheme for the numbering of these structures, and it is a feature of modern anatomy textbooks. In this article, we discuss the rationale behind this odd numbering, and consider its origins. One reason given is that there is a transient 5th arch that is never fully realized, while another is that this numbering reflects considerations from comparative anatomy. We show here, however, that neither of these reasons has substance. There is no evidence from embryology for a ‘5th’ arch, and the comparative argument does not hold as it does not apply across the vertebrates. We conclude that there is no justification for this strange numbering. We suggest that the pharyngeal arches should simply be numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 as this would be in keeping with the embryology and with the general numbering of the pharyngeal arches across the vertebrates.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1019-1023
Number of pages	5
Journal	Journal of Anatomy
Volume	235
Issue number	6
Early online date	11 Aug 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13067
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2019

Keywords

amniotes
human embryology
pharyngeal arches
pharyngeal pouches
tetrapod evolution

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13067

Cite this

@article{881e2db880b1481689e265e259e344fc,

title = "A reappraisal and revision of the numbering of the pharyngeal arches",

abstract = "The pharyngeal arches are a prominent and significant feature of vertebrate embryos. These are visible as a series of bulges on the lateral surface of the embryonic head. In humans, and other amniotes, there are five pharyngeal arches numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6; note the missing {\textquoteleft}5{\textquoteright}. This is the standard scheme for the numbering of these structures, and it is a feature of modern anatomy textbooks. In this article, we discuss the rationale behind this odd numbering, and consider its origins. One reason given is that there is a transient 5th arch that is never fully realized, while another is that this numbering reflects considerations from comparative anatomy. We show here, however, that neither of these reasons has substance. There is no evidence from embryology for a {\textquoteleft}5th{\textquoteright} arch, and the comparative argument does not hold as it does not apply across the vertebrates. We conclude that there is no justification for this strange numbering. We suggest that the pharyngeal arches should simply be numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 as this would be in keeping with the embryology and with the general numbering of the pharyngeal arches across the vertebrates.",

keywords = "amniotes, human embryology, pharyngeal arches, pharyngeal pouches, tetrapod evolution",

author = "Anthony Graham and Subathra Poopalasundaram and Victoria Shone and Clemens Kiecker",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13067",

language = "English",

volume = "235",

pages = "1019--1023",

journal = "Journal of Anatomy",

issn = "0021-8782",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A reappraisal and revision of the numbering of the pharyngeal arches

AU - Graham, Anthony

AU - Poopalasundaram, Subathra

AU - Shone, Victoria

AU - Kiecker, Clemens

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - The pharyngeal arches are a prominent and significant feature of vertebrate embryos. These are visible as a series of bulges on the lateral surface of the embryonic head. In humans, and other amniotes, there are five pharyngeal arches numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6; note the missing ‘5’. This is the standard scheme for the numbering of these structures, and it is a feature of modern anatomy textbooks. In this article, we discuss the rationale behind this odd numbering, and consider its origins. One reason given is that there is a transient 5th arch that is never fully realized, while another is that this numbering reflects considerations from comparative anatomy. We show here, however, that neither of these reasons has substance. There is no evidence from embryology for a ‘5th’ arch, and the comparative argument does not hold as it does not apply across the vertebrates. We conclude that there is no justification for this strange numbering. We suggest that the pharyngeal arches should simply be numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 as this would be in keeping with the embryology and with the general numbering of the pharyngeal arches across the vertebrates.

AB - The pharyngeal arches are a prominent and significant feature of vertebrate embryos. These are visible as a series of bulges on the lateral surface of the embryonic head. In humans, and other amniotes, there are five pharyngeal arches numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6; note the missing ‘5’. This is the standard scheme for the numbering of these structures, and it is a feature of modern anatomy textbooks. In this article, we discuss the rationale behind this odd numbering, and consider its origins. One reason given is that there is a transient 5th arch that is never fully realized, while another is that this numbering reflects considerations from comparative anatomy. We show here, however, that neither of these reasons has substance. There is no evidence from embryology for a ‘5th’ arch, and the comparative argument does not hold as it does not apply across the vertebrates. We conclude that there is no justification for this strange numbering. We suggest that the pharyngeal arches should simply be numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 as this would be in keeping with the embryology and with the general numbering of the pharyngeal arches across the vertebrates.

KW - amniotes

KW - human embryology

KW - pharyngeal arches

KW - pharyngeal pouches

KW - tetrapod evolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070673732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13067

DO - https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13067

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85070673732

SN - 0021-8782

VL - 235

SP - 1019

EP - 1023

JO - Journal of Anatomy

JF - Journal of Anatomy

IS - 6

ER -

A reappraisal and revision of the numbering of the pharyngeal arches

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this