Abstract
Action is the primary form of communication in the domain of cyber-security. Consider Russia attacking Georgia, Estonia, Ukraine; Stuxnet; US_China operations; even Islamic State until its recent defeats. All show actors acting first, legitimizing through communication later. Despite much focus on actors using strategic narratives to articulate their vision of the past, present and future of international security, our analysis of a range of cases indicates that narratives are post-hoc and reactive to decisive actions. The authors propose that research should address the aesthetics of these actions; the effectiveness of the persuasion or securitization of those seeking to frame the Internet as a space of war on elite and public opinion; and the need for a mapping of the global architecture of cyber-security. Since communication is at the heart of these questions, scholars of digital politics are uniquely advantaged to build compelling explanations of interactions in the cyber-security domain.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Edward Elgar Publishing |
Editors | William H. Dutton |
Chapter | 13 |
Pages | 146-158 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781789903096 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 18 May 2020 |
Keywords
- Digital communication
- New Political Communications
- Cybersecurity
- Cyber
- Diplomacy
- Norms
- International relations