A review of Bayesian perspectives on sample size derivation for confirmatory trials

Kunzmann, Grayling, Kim May Lee, Robertson, Rufibach, Wason

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sample size derivation is a crucial element of planning any confirmatory trial. The required sample size is typically derived based on constraints on the maximal acceptable Type I error rate and minimal desired power. Power depends on the unknown true effect and tends to be calculated either for the smallest relevant effect or a likely point alternative. The former might be problematic if the minimal relevant effect is close to the null, thus requiring an excessively large sample size, while the latter is dubious since it does not account for the a priori uncertainty about the likely alternative effect. A Bayesian perspective on sample size derivation for a frequentist trial can reconcile arguments about the relative a priori plausibility of alternative effects with ideas based on the relevance of effect sizes. Many suggestions as to how such “hybrid” approaches could be implemented in practice have been put forward. However, key quantities are often defined in subtly different ways in the literature. Starting from the traditional entirely frequentist approach to sample size derivation, we derive consistent definitions for the most commonly used hybrid quantities and highlight connections, before discussing and demonstrating their use in sample size derivation for clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)424-432
Number of pages9
JournalAMERICAN STATISTICIAN
Volume75
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of Bayesian perspectives on sample size derivation for confirmatory trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this