A systematic review and meta-analysis of set-shifting ability in eating disorders

Marion E Roberts, Kate Tchanturia, Daniel Stahl, Laura Southgate, Janet Treasure

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature reviewpeer-review

403 Citations (Scopus)


Background The aim was to critically appraise and synthesize the literature relating to set-shifting ability in eating disorders. PsycINFO, Medline, and Web of Science databases were searched to December 2005. Hand searching of eating-disorder journals and relevant reference sections was also undertaken. Method The 15 selected studies contained both eating disorder and healthy control groups, and employed at least one of the following six neuropsychological measures of set-shifting ability; Trail Making Test (TMT), Wisconsin Card Sort Test (WCST), Brixton task, Haptic Illusion, CatBat task, or the set-shifting subset of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). The outcome variable was performance on the set-shifting aspect of the task. Pooled standardized mean differences (effect sizes) were calculated. Results TMT, WCST, CatBat and Haptic tasks had sufficient sample sizes for meta-analysis. These four tasks yielded acceptable pooled standardized effect sizes (0·36; TMT −1·05; Haptic) with moderate variation within studies (as measured by confidence intervals). The Brixton task showed a small pooled mean difference, and displayed more variation between sample results. The effect size for CANTAB set shifting was 0·17. Conclusion Problems in set shifting as measured by a variety of neuropsychological tasks are present in people with eating disorders.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1075 - 1084
Number of pages10
JournalPsychological Medicine
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2007


Dive into the research topics of 'A systematic review and meta-analysis of set-shifting ability in eating disorders'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this