King's College London

Research portal

A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Standard

A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer. / Ní Laoire, Áine; Fettes, Lucy; Murtagh, Fliss.

In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 10, 01.12.2017, p. 975-981.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Harvard

Ní Laoire, Á, Fettes, L & Murtagh, F 2017, 'A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer', Palliative Medicine, vol. 31, no. 10, pp. 975-981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317697897

APA

Ní Laoire, Á., Fettes, L., & Murtagh, F. (2017). A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer. Palliative Medicine, 31(10), 975-981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317697897

Vancouver

Ní Laoire Á, Fettes L, Murtagh F. A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer. Palliative Medicine. 2017 Dec 1;31(10):975-981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317697897

Author

Ní Laoire, Áine ; Fettes, Lucy ; Murtagh, Fliss. / A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer. In: Palliative Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 10. pp. 975-981.

Bibtex Download

@article{cb444cf9fa114e9f8416a6fe3b094fd0,
title = "A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer",
abstract = "Background: Rectal tenesmus is a distressing symptom in patients with advanced cancer and challenging to treat. There is lack of consensus on the appropriate management of tenesmus in this patient population. Aim: To identify and examine the effectiveness of interventions to palliate rectal tenesmus caused by advanced cancer when surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy are no longer treatment options. Design: A systematic review of the literature following standard systematic review methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. Data sources: A comprehensive search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was conducted from date of inception to April 2016. PubMed {\textquoteleft}related articles{\textquoteright} search, grey literature search and hand-searches of the bibliographies of relevant papers and textbooks were also performed. Non-cancer patients were excluded. Any studies involving surgery or radiotherapy to treat tenesmus were excluded. Studies involving interventions to treat pelvic pain syndromes without specific outcome measures on severity of tenesmus were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence–recommended quality assessment tool. Results: From 861 studies, 9 met full criteria and were selected. All were case series investigating the use of pharmacological interventions (diltiazem, nifedipine, methadone, mexiletine hydrochloride, lidocaine and bupivacaine), anaesthetic interventions (lumbar sympathectomy, neurolytic superior hypogastric plexus block), and endoscopic laser interventions. The included studies showed substantial heterogeneity, and therefore, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Conclusion: From this review, we identified a significant gap in research into the palliation of rectal tenesmus. A multimodal approach may be necessary due to the complexity of the pathophysiology of tenesmus. Future research should focus on randomised controlled trials of drug therapies whose potential effectiveness is suggested by case series.",
keywords = "neoplasm, pain, palliative care, Rectum, systematic review",
author = "{N{\'i} Laoire}, {\'A}ine and Lucy Fettes and Fliss Murtagh",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0269216317697897",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "975--981",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
number = "10",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - A systematic review of the effectiveness of palliative interventions to treat rectal tenesmus in cancer

AU - Ní Laoire, Áine

AU - Fettes, Lucy

AU - Murtagh, Fliss

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Background: Rectal tenesmus is a distressing symptom in patients with advanced cancer and challenging to treat. There is lack of consensus on the appropriate management of tenesmus in this patient population. Aim: To identify and examine the effectiveness of interventions to palliate rectal tenesmus caused by advanced cancer when surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy are no longer treatment options. Design: A systematic review of the literature following standard systematic review methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. Data sources: A comprehensive search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was conducted from date of inception to April 2016. PubMed ‘related articles’ search, grey literature search and hand-searches of the bibliographies of relevant papers and textbooks were also performed. Non-cancer patients were excluded. Any studies involving surgery or radiotherapy to treat tenesmus were excluded. Studies involving interventions to treat pelvic pain syndromes without specific outcome measures on severity of tenesmus were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence–recommended quality assessment tool. Results: From 861 studies, 9 met full criteria and were selected. All were case series investigating the use of pharmacological interventions (diltiazem, nifedipine, methadone, mexiletine hydrochloride, lidocaine and bupivacaine), anaesthetic interventions (lumbar sympathectomy, neurolytic superior hypogastric plexus block), and endoscopic laser interventions. The included studies showed substantial heterogeneity, and therefore, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Conclusion: From this review, we identified a significant gap in research into the palliation of rectal tenesmus. A multimodal approach may be necessary due to the complexity of the pathophysiology of tenesmus. Future research should focus on randomised controlled trials of drug therapies whose potential effectiveness is suggested by case series.

AB - Background: Rectal tenesmus is a distressing symptom in patients with advanced cancer and challenging to treat. There is lack of consensus on the appropriate management of tenesmus in this patient population. Aim: To identify and examine the effectiveness of interventions to palliate rectal tenesmus caused by advanced cancer when surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy are no longer treatment options. Design: A systematic review of the literature following standard systematic review methodology and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. Data sources: A comprehensive search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was conducted from date of inception to April 2016. PubMed ‘related articles’ search, grey literature search and hand-searches of the bibliographies of relevant papers and textbooks were also performed. Non-cancer patients were excluded. Any studies involving surgery or radiotherapy to treat tenesmus were excluded. Studies involving interventions to treat pelvic pain syndromes without specific outcome measures on severity of tenesmus were excluded. The quality of the studies was assessed using a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence–recommended quality assessment tool. Results: From 861 studies, 9 met full criteria and were selected. All were case series investigating the use of pharmacological interventions (diltiazem, nifedipine, methadone, mexiletine hydrochloride, lidocaine and bupivacaine), anaesthetic interventions (lumbar sympathectomy, neurolytic superior hypogastric plexus block), and endoscopic laser interventions. The included studies showed substantial heterogeneity, and therefore, a meta-analysis was not feasible. Conclusion: From this review, we identified a significant gap in research into the palliation of rectal tenesmus. A multimodal approach may be necessary due to the complexity of the pathophysiology of tenesmus. Future research should focus on randomised controlled trials of drug therapies whose potential effectiveness is suggested by case series.

KW - neoplasm

KW - pain

KW - palliative care

KW - Rectum

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034866055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0269216317697897

DO - 10.1177/0269216317697897

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85034866055

VL - 31

SP - 975

EP - 981

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 10

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454