King's College London

Research portal

Abuse in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic qualitative review and typology

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Standard

Abuse in assisted reproductive technology : A systematic qualitative review and typology. / Hodson, Nathan; Bewley, Susan.

In: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Vol. 238, 07.2019, p. 170-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Harvard

Hodson, N & Bewley, S 2019, 'Abuse in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic qualitative review and typology', European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 238, pp. 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.027

APA

Hodson, N., & Bewley, S. (2019). Abuse in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic qualitative review and typology. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 238, 170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.027

Vancouver

Hodson N, Bewley S. Abuse in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic qualitative review and typology. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2019 Jul;238:170-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.027

Author

Hodson, Nathan ; Bewley, Susan. / Abuse in assisted reproductive technology : A systematic qualitative review and typology. In: European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2019 ; Vol. 238. pp. 170-177.

Bibtex Download

@article{23b0210e6a3a435d92e77a664be28404,
title = "Abuse in assisted reproductive technology: A systematic qualitative review and typology",
abstract = "Objectives: Abuse of vulnerable patients exists in many healthcare settings and has been recognised as an inherent risk in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Systematic reviews have been used to develop typologies of abuse and ethical issues in other settings including obstetrics. The aim was to determine the full spectrum of abuse that patients can experience when using assisted reproductive technology. Study Design: A systematic qualitative review. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for combinations of terms related to abuse and terms relating to ART. The last search was performed on February 12th 2018. Selection criteria were that the authors reported evidence of abuse. There were no exclusions by date, language or methodology. Papers lacking analysis of abuses in ART were excluded. For data collection and analysis, themes identified in the academic literature were coded using thematic qualitative analysis by two independent researchers. Themes were developed discursively. Results: There were 381 publications of which 44 full text articles were screened. The 34 included papers detailed abuses from 4 decades and 5 continents. There were no quantitative papers measuring prevalence. The resulting coding framework was presented as a typology of abuse in assisted reproductive technology with three first order themes: exploitation of class-based vulnerabilities, excessive intervention, and failures of aftercare. Conclusions: A wide range of categories of abuse was found despite the paucity of formal literature. A concerted public health approach to infertility is required, combined with an emphasis on trying conservative approaches first. More primary research is required on prevalence of abuse, and values and preferences, particularly in “egg sharing” and post-mortem reproduction.",
keywords = "Abuse, Assisted reproductive technology, Law, Qualitative evidence synthesis, Systematic review",
author = "Nathan Hodson and Susan Bewley",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.027",
language = "English",
volume = "238",
pages = "170--177",
journal = "European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology",
issn = "0301-2115",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS (suitable for import to EndNote) Download

TY - JOUR

T1 - Abuse in assisted reproductive technology

T2 - A systematic qualitative review and typology

AU - Hodson, Nathan

AU - Bewley, Susan

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - Objectives: Abuse of vulnerable patients exists in many healthcare settings and has been recognised as an inherent risk in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Systematic reviews have been used to develop typologies of abuse and ethical issues in other settings including obstetrics. The aim was to determine the full spectrum of abuse that patients can experience when using assisted reproductive technology. Study Design: A systematic qualitative review. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for combinations of terms related to abuse and terms relating to ART. The last search was performed on February 12th 2018. Selection criteria were that the authors reported evidence of abuse. There were no exclusions by date, language or methodology. Papers lacking analysis of abuses in ART were excluded. For data collection and analysis, themes identified in the academic literature were coded using thematic qualitative analysis by two independent researchers. Themes were developed discursively. Results: There were 381 publications of which 44 full text articles were screened. The 34 included papers detailed abuses from 4 decades and 5 continents. There were no quantitative papers measuring prevalence. The resulting coding framework was presented as a typology of abuse in assisted reproductive technology with three first order themes: exploitation of class-based vulnerabilities, excessive intervention, and failures of aftercare. Conclusions: A wide range of categories of abuse was found despite the paucity of formal literature. A concerted public health approach to infertility is required, combined with an emphasis on trying conservative approaches first. More primary research is required on prevalence of abuse, and values and preferences, particularly in “egg sharing” and post-mortem reproduction.

AB - Objectives: Abuse of vulnerable patients exists in many healthcare settings and has been recognised as an inherent risk in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Systematic reviews have been used to develop typologies of abuse and ethical issues in other settings including obstetrics. The aim was to determine the full spectrum of abuse that patients can experience when using assisted reproductive technology. Study Design: A systematic qualitative review. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO were searched for combinations of terms related to abuse and terms relating to ART. The last search was performed on February 12th 2018. Selection criteria were that the authors reported evidence of abuse. There were no exclusions by date, language or methodology. Papers lacking analysis of abuses in ART were excluded. For data collection and analysis, themes identified in the academic literature were coded using thematic qualitative analysis by two independent researchers. Themes were developed discursively. Results: There were 381 publications of which 44 full text articles were screened. The 34 included papers detailed abuses from 4 decades and 5 continents. There were no quantitative papers measuring prevalence. The resulting coding framework was presented as a typology of abuse in assisted reproductive technology with three first order themes: exploitation of class-based vulnerabilities, excessive intervention, and failures of aftercare. Conclusions: A wide range of categories of abuse was found despite the paucity of formal literature. A concerted public health approach to infertility is required, combined with an emphasis on trying conservative approaches first. More primary research is required on prevalence of abuse, and values and preferences, particularly in “egg sharing” and post-mortem reproduction.

KW - Abuse

KW - Assisted reproductive technology

KW - Law

KW - Qualitative evidence synthesis

KW - Systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067080749&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.027

DO - 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.027

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85067080749

VL - 238

SP - 170

EP - 177

JO - European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

JF - European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

SN - 0301-2115

ER -

View graph of relations

© 2018 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454