Accountability for Torture Abroad and the Limits of the Act of State Doctrine: Comments on Habib v. Commonwealth of Australia

Ben Batros, Philippa Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyses the decision of the Federal Court of Australia that a claim brought by an Australian citizen against Australian government officials, who had allegedly aided and abetted his torture at the hands of foreign governments, was not barred by the act of state doctrine. The article provides critical reflections on the reasoning of the Australian court and the limitations of the act of state doctrine. It draws out the broader implications of the decision for efforts to secure accountability for torture committed abroad and the role of domestic courts in the international legal order.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbermqq048
Pages (from-to)1153-1174
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of International Criminal Justice
Volume8
Issue number4
Early online date25 Aug 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accountability for Torture Abroad and the Limits of the Act of State Doctrine: Comments on Habib v. Commonwealth of Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this