Accounting for diverging paths in most similar cases: corruption in Baltics and Caucasus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)
256 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper discusses the conditions under which post-Soviet states succeed in fighting corruption. The method of paired comparison of most similar cases, Estonia and Latvia on the one hand and Georgia and Armenia on the other, is used to tease out the variables that vary within and across pairs and produce divergence. It is argued that young, and structurally and ideologically cohesive, groups in power that are antagonistically predisposed toward the former colonial patron and free from the influence of the old guard are more likely to reform while enduring political-economic networks undermine anti-corruption reform.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-208
JournalCRIME LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE
Volume67
Issue number2
Early online date17 Oct 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for diverging paths in most similar cases: corruption in Baltics and Caucasus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this