Accounting for health-care outcomes: implications for intensive care unit practice and performance

Roslyn Sorensen, Rick Iedema

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The aim of this study was to understand the environment of health care, and how clinicians and managers respond in terms of performance accountability. A qualitative method was used in a tertiary metropolitan teaching intensive care unit (ICU) in Sydney, Australia, including interviews with 15 clinical managers and focus groups with 29 nurses of differing experience. The study found that a managerial focus on abstract goals, such as budgets detracted from managing the core business of clinical work. Fractures were evident within clinical units, between clinical units and between clinical and managerial domains. These fractures reinforced the status quo where seemingly unconnected patient care activities were undertaken by loosely connected individual clinicians with personalized concepts of accountability. Managers must conceptualize health services as an interconnected entity within which self-directed teams negotiate and agree objectives, collect and review performance data and define collective practice. Organically developing regimens of care within and across specialist clinical units, such as in ICUs, directly impact upon health service performance and accountability.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)97-102
    JournalHEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
    Volume23
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2010

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Accounting for health-care outcomes: implications for intensive care unit practice and performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this