Accuracy of the national institute for neurological disorders and stroke/society for progressive supranuclear palsy and neuroprotection and natural history in Parkinson plus syndromes criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy

Gesine Respondek, Sigrun Roeber, Hans Kretzschmar, Claire Troakes, Safa Al-Sarraj, Ellen Gelpi, Carles Gaig, Wang Zheng Chiu, John C. van Swieten, Wolfgang H. Oertel, Guenter U. Hoeglinger*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Autopsy is the diagnostic gold standard for progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and Society for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (NINDS-SPSP) criteria for the clinical diagnosis of probable PSP are thought to possess high specificity and low sensitivity. The NINDS-SPSP criteria for possible PSP are considered to increase sensitivity at the expense of specificity. The Neuroprotection and Natural History in Parkinson Plus Syndromes (NNIPPS) criteria are intended to improve sensitivity while maintaining high specificity. The aim of this study was to conduct a clinicopathological evaluation of the NINDS-SPSP and NNIPPS criteria in tertiary neurological centers. Defined clinical features and their year of onset were recorded by chart review in neuropathologically diagnosed patients with PSP, Parkinsons's disease (PD), MSA parkinsonism and corticobasal degeneration from four European brain banks. Fulfilment of the clinical diagnostic criteria was verified for each year after disease onset and for the final antemortem record. We analyzed 98 PSP patients and 46 disease controls. The NINDS-SPSP probable criteria yielded shorter time to diagnosis, slightly higher specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), and similar sensitivity, compared with the NNIPPS criteria. Unexpectedly, the NINDS-SPSP possible criteria yielded the lowest sensitivity, specificity, and PPV. A combination of NINDS-SPSP possible and probable criteria yielded the highest sensitivity. We suggest that the NINDS-SPSP probable criteria might be preferred for recruitment of patients for clinical trials, where an early and specific diagnosis is important. For routine clinical care, where high sensitivity is crucial, a combination of NINDS possible and probable criteria might be preferred. (c) 2013 Movement Disorder Society

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)504-509
Number of pages6
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2013

Keywords

  • clinical diagnostic criteria
  • sensitivity
  • neuropathology
  • progressive supranuclear palsy
  • NEUROPATHOLOGIC CRITERIA
  • specificity
  • CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS
  • RICHARDSON-OLSZEWSKI SYNDROME
  • CORTICOBASAL DEGENERATION
  • MULTIPLE SYSTEM ATROPHY

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of the national institute for neurological disorders and stroke/society for progressive supranuclear palsy and neuroprotection and natural history in Parkinson plus syndromes criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this