Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques

C C Glüer, G Blake, Y Lu, B A Blunt, M Jergas, H K Genant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1142 Citations (Scopus)


Assessment of precision errors in bone mineral densitometry is important for characterization of a technique's ability to detect longitudinal skeletal changes. Short-term and long-term precision errors should be calculated as root-mean-square (RMS) averages of standard deviations of repeated measurements (SD) and standard errors of the estimate of changes in bone density with time (SEE), respectively. Inadequate adjustment for degrees of freedom and use of arithmetic means instead of RMS averages may cause underestimation of true imprecision by up to 41% and 25% (for duplicate measurements), respectively. Calculation of confidence intervals of precision errors based on the number of repeated measurements and the number of subjects assessed serves to characterize limitations of precision error assessments. Provided that precision error are comparable across subjects, examinations with a total of 27 degrees of freedom result in an upper 90% confidence limit of +30% of the mean precision error, a level considered sufficient for characterizing technique imprecision. We recommend three (or four) repeated measurements per individual in a subject group of at least 14 individuals to characterize short-term (or long-term) precision of a technique.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberN/A
Pages (from-to)262-270
Number of pages9
JournalOsteoporosis International
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Jul 1995


Dive into the research topics of 'Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this