An Alternative to the Thucydides Trap: The Buffer Zone of Byzantium and Sasanian Persia

Kevin Blachford

doi:10.1080/07075332.2021.2005660

An Alternative to the Thucydides Trap: The Buffer Zone of Byzantium and Sasanian Persia

Kevin Blachford

Defence Studies

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The return of contemporary great power rivalry has renewed interest in the idea of a ‘Thucydides trap’ within IR and security studies. Missing, however, are discussions of great power conflict between Thucydides and 1648. The following paper seeks to open new ground by examining the bipolar rivalry between Byzantium and the Sasanid empire. This four century rivalry rested upon a fragile buffer zone along the eastern Roman frontier. Its longevity was based on a stable offense-defense balance that eventually collapsed in the seventh century. The Thucydides trap narrative presents a bipolar clash with an air of inevitability, this interdisciplinary case study however, develops a more nuanced narrative, which shows how the Byzantium and the Sasanid rivalry existed across a buffer zone that only collapsed once imperial ideologies led to competing irreconcilable visions of international order.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1077-1090
Journal	INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW
Volume	44
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/07075332.2021.2005660
Publication status	Published - 2021

Access to Document

10.1080/07075332.2021.2005660

Cite this

@article{7443807fd1b64c609caac88d67b75178,

title = "An Alternative to the Thucydides Trap: The Buffer Zone of Byzantium and Sasanian Persia",

abstract = "The return of contemporary great power rivalry has renewed interest in the idea of a {\textquoteleft}Thucydides trap{\textquoteright} within IR and security studies. Missing, however, are discussions of great power conflict between Thucydides and 1648. The following paper seeks to open new ground by examining the bipolar rivalry between Byzantium and the Sasanid empire. This four century rivalry rested upon a fragile buffer zone along the eastern Roman frontier. Its longevity was based on a stable offense-defense balance that eventually collapsed in the seventh century. The Thucydides trap narrative presents a bipolar clash with an air of inevitability, this interdisciplinary case study however, develops a more nuanced narrative, which shows how the Byzantium and the Sasanid rivalry existed across a buffer zone that only collapsed once imperial ideologies led to competing irreconcilable visions of international order.",

author = "Kevin Blachford",

year = "2021",

doi = "10.1080/07075332.2021.2005660",

language = "English",

volume = "44",

pages = "1077--1090 ",

journal = "INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW",

issn = "0707-5332",

publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Alternative to the Thucydides Trap: The Buffer Zone of Byzantium and Sasanian Persia

AU - Blachford, Kevin

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The return of contemporary great power rivalry has renewed interest in the idea of a ‘Thucydides trap’ within IR and security studies. Missing, however, are discussions of great power conflict between Thucydides and 1648. The following paper seeks to open new ground by examining the bipolar rivalry between Byzantium and the Sasanid empire. This four century rivalry rested upon a fragile buffer zone along the eastern Roman frontier. Its longevity was based on a stable offense-defense balance that eventually collapsed in the seventh century. The Thucydides trap narrative presents a bipolar clash with an air of inevitability, this interdisciplinary case study however, develops a more nuanced narrative, which shows how the Byzantium and the Sasanid rivalry existed across a buffer zone that only collapsed once imperial ideologies led to competing irreconcilable visions of international order.

AB - The return of contemporary great power rivalry has renewed interest in the idea of a ‘Thucydides trap’ within IR and security studies. Missing, however, are discussions of great power conflict between Thucydides and 1648. The following paper seeks to open new ground by examining the bipolar rivalry between Byzantium and the Sasanid empire. This four century rivalry rested upon a fragile buffer zone along the eastern Roman frontier. Its longevity was based on a stable offense-defense balance that eventually collapsed in the seventh century. The Thucydides trap narrative presents a bipolar clash with an air of inevitability, this interdisciplinary case study however, develops a more nuanced narrative, which shows how the Byzantium and the Sasanid rivalry existed across a buffer zone that only collapsed once imperial ideologies led to competing irreconcilable visions of international order.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85119657596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07075332.2021.2005660

DO - 10.1080/07075332.2021.2005660

M3 - Article

SN - 0707-5332

VL - 44

SP - 1077

EP - 1090

JO - INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW

JF - INTERNATIONAL HISTORY REVIEW

IS - 5

ER -

An Alternative to the Thucydides Trap: The Buffer Zone of Byzantium and Sasanian Persia

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this