King's College London

Research portal

An Analysis of Palliative Care Development in Africa: A Ranking based on Region-Specific Macro-Indicators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

John Y. Rhee, Eduardo Garralda, Eve Namisango, Emmanuel Luyirika, Liliana de Lima, Richard A. Powell, Jesús López-Fidalgo, Carlos Centeno

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Early online date22 May 2018
DOIs
Accepted/In press4 May 2018
E-pub ahead of print22 May 2018

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Context
To date, there is no study comparing palliative care (PC) development among African countries.

Objective
To analyze comparatively PC development in African countries based on region-specific indicators.

Methods
Data were obtained from the APCA Atlas of PC in Africa and a comparative analysis conducted. Nineteen indicators were developed and defined through qualitative interviews with African PC experts and a two-round modified Delphi consensus process with international experts on global PC indicators. Indicators were grouped by the WHO public health strategy for PC dimensions. These indicators were then sent as a survey to key informants in 52/54 African countries. Through an expert weighting process and ratings from the modified Delphi, weights were assigned to each indicator.

Results
Surveys were received from 89% (48/54) of African countries. The top three countries in overall PC development were, in order, Uganda, South Africa, and Kenya. Variability existed by dimension. The top three countries in specialized services were Uganda, South Africa, and Nigeria; in policies, it was Botswana followed by parity among Ethiopia, Rwanda, and Swaziland; in medicines, it was Swaziland, South Africa, then Malawi; in education, it was equivalent between Uganda and Kenya, then Ghana and Zambia.

Conclusion
Uganda, South Africa, and Kenya are the highest performing countries and were the only ones with composite scores greater than 0.5 (50%). However, not one country universally supersedes all others across all four PC dimensions. The breakdown of rankings by dimension highlights where even high-performing African countries can focus their efforts to further PC development.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454