Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
An empirical examination of the use of Easy Read health information in health consultations involving patients with intellectual disabilities. / Chinn, Deborah.
In: JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 01.09.2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - An empirical examination of the use of Easy Read health information in health consultations involving patients with intellectual disabilities
AU - Chinn, Deborah
PY - 2019/9/1
Y1 - 2019/9/1
N2 - Background: Easy Read health information (ERHI) has the potential to promote engagement in health care for people with intellectual disabilities. This study examined how ERHI was actually employed by clinicians and received by patients. Method: Video recordings were made of 32 patients with intellectual disabilities attending a health check with primary care clinicians who had been given access to a range of ERHI, and 9 attending a health appointment with a specialist intellectual disability nurse. The recordings were analysed using conversation analysis. Results: Easy Read health information was visible in only 7 (22%) of the primary care health checks (though not always shared with the patients). Easy Read health information was used in sequences where clinicians offered unsolicited health advice and met with degrees of resistance from patients, though its potential for shared decision making was also evident. Conclusions: Easy Read health information can aid patient understanding and decision making, but attention should be paid to the interactional practices accompanying their use.
AB - Background: Easy Read health information (ERHI) has the potential to promote engagement in health care for people with intellectual disabilities. This study examined how ERHI was actually employed by clinicians and received by patients. Method: Video recordings were made of 32 patients with intellectual disabilities attending a health check with primary care clinicians who had been given access to a range of ERHI, and 9 attending a health appointment with a specialist intellectual disability nurse. The recordings were analysed using conversation analysis. Results: Easy Read health information was visible in only 7 (22%) of the primary care health checks (though not always shared with the patients). Easy Read health information was used in sequences where clinicians offered unsolicited health advice and met with degrees of resistance from patients, though its potential for shared decision making was also evident. Conclusions: Easy Read health information can aid patient understanding and decision making, but attention should be paid to the interactional practices accompanying their use.
KW - accessible information
KW - conversation analysis
KW - Easy Read
KW - health checks
KW - intellectual disabilities
KW - literacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071499546&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jar.12657
DO - 10.1111/jar.12657
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071499546
JO - JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
JF - JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES
SN - 1360-2322
ER -
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454