An exploratory quality assessment of orthodontic clinical guidelines using the AGREE II instrument

Tasneem Tejani, Suhaym Mubeen, Jadbinder Seehra, Martyn T Cobourne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: Clinical guidelines act as a means of assisting clinicians in improving the quality of healthcare provided. We aim to assess the quality of currently available international orthodontic guidelines.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional systematic assessment of orthodontic clinical guidelines was undertaken. A Medline search using the keywords 'guideline', 'orthodontics', and 'dent', and search of specific dental and orthodontic organization websites for orthodontic-related clinical guidelines. Relevant guidelines published between 1999 and 2012 in English were identified. Draft guidelines and endorsements were excluded. The quality of each guideline was evaluated by a single calibrated assessor using the AGREE II instrument. Variation in the quality of guidelines produced by different organizations was also assessed.

Results: Seventeen guidelines were included in this study. Overall, the reporting of scope and purpose (84.31, 95% CI: 70.91-97.72) and clarity of presentation (75.49, 95% CI: 61.68-89.3) domains of the AGREE II instrument were deemed of high quality. Lower scores were obtained for the following domains: rigour of development (52.08, 95% CI: 37.59-66.57), editorial independence (47.06, 95% CI: 20.6-73.51), stakeholder agreement (46.41, 95% CI: 29.66-63.15), and applicability (27.45, 95% CI: 8.26-46.64). There was a noted difference in the individual domain scores of orthodontic guidelines produced by the different organizations.

Conclusions: In relation to the AGREE II instrument, the quality of orthodontic guidelines for use in clinical practice are deemed sub-optimal. Variation in the quality of guidelines produced different organizations is evident.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-659
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Orthodontics
Volume39
Issue number6
Early online date5 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An exploratory quality assessment of orthodontic clinical guidelines using the AGREE II instrument'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this