An In Vitro Assessment of Gutta-Percha Coating of New Carrier-Based Root Canal Fillings

Raghad Abdulrazzaq Alhashimi*, Richard Foxton, Shihab Romeed, Sanjukta Deb

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)


The first aim of this paper was to evaluate the push-out bond strength of the gutta-percha coating of Thermafil and GuttaCore and compare it with that of gutta-percha used to coat an experimental hydroxyapatite/polyethylene (HA/PE) obturator. The second aim was to assess the thickness of gutta-percha around the carriers of GuttaCore and HA/PE obturators using microcomputed tomography (mu CT). Ten (size 30) 1mm thick samples of each group (Thermafil, GuttaCore, and HA/PE) were prepared. An orthodontic wire with a diameter of 0.5mm was attached to the plunger of an Instron machine in order to allow the push-out testing of the gutta-percha coating. Five samples of (GuttaCore and HA/PE) were scanned using mu CT. The data obtained were analysed with one-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test. HA/PE obturators exhibited significantly higher push-out bond strength (P <0.001) determined at 6.84 +/- 0.96 than those of Guttacore around 3.75 +/- 0.75 and Thermafil at 1.5 +/- 0.63. GuttaCore demonstrated significantly higher bond strength than Thermafil (P <0.001). mu CT imaging revealed that the thickness of gutta-percha around the experimental HA/PE carrier was homogeneously distributed. The bondability and thickness of gutta-percha coating around HA/PE carriers were superior to those of GuttaCore and Thermafil obturators.

Original languageEnglish
Article number239754
Number of pages6
Publication statusPublished - 6 Mar 2014




Dive into the research topics of 'An In Vitro Assessment of Gutta-Percha Coating of New Carrier-Based Root Canal Fillings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this