King's College London

Research portal

An inferior source? Quantitatively analysing the production and revision of five technology-enhanced learning-related terms on wikipedia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Michael Flavin, Katerina Hulova

Original languageEnglish
JournalResearch in Learning Technology
Published23 Nov 2018

King's Authors


This article analyses five technology-enhanced learning-related terms on Wikipedia, assessing their usefulness in relation to academic journal articles concerning the same terms. Data were obtained about the word lengths of the Wikipedia articles, the numbers of Wikipedia edits and numbers of academic journal publications over the first 5 years after the creation of the first Wikipedia entry. Data were gathered directly from Wikipedia, as well as the academic journal aggrega-tor Academic Search Complete, and were analysed in IBM SPSS 23. The article argues that Wikipedia can be more useful than academic journal articles in the new and emerging phases of a technology, because of the volume of information made available, together with the speed of its publication and the updating of its contents.

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454