Abstract
During the Tang Dynasty, officials, who are often described as “Confucians,” were involved in policies that aimed at controlling the religious congregations of Buddhism and Daoism. At the same time, pseudo-religious free-riders, the so called fangshi (“esoteric experts”), regularly appeared at the court and lured the emperor away from government business by pretending to support his search for immortality with their methods. They thereby constituted a threat to the claim of the officials to a monopoly on sharing the imperial power. Furthermore, officials saw themselves as transmitters of a “civil religion” or theology” of correct governance, which was not limited to the Confucian canon, but embraced other figures such as Laozi and the Yellow Emperor as well. My essay takes Li Deyu (787–850) as an example, who was one of the most prominent officials of the Tang Dynasty and served as chancellor during the severest religious persecution in Chinese history. I show how he drew arguments from historiographic and philosophical sources, in order to bolster his position against Daoists or fangshi and protect the civil religion. I will further show how he flexibly used rhetorical strategies to support the persecution of Buddhism on the one hand, and to justify the compatibility of Buddhism with Confucian and Daoist ethics on the other.
| Translated title of the contribution | Anti-Clericalism and Rhetoric of Exclusion under the Tang: Religious Politics in the Thought of Li Deyu |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Pages (from-to) | 181-213 |
| Number of pages | 33 |
| Journal | Bochumer Jahrbuch zur Ostasienforschung |
| Volume | 34 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Tang-China, religion & politics, Medieval history