Abstract
This article proposes a typology of three broad means through which bigotry may be promoted through lexicography, and then exemplifies each with demonstrably antisemitic examples drawn from the Urban Dictionary: a global top-1000 website built upon user-generated content. It argues that the Urban Dictionary’s founding principles have directly facilitated the site’s exploitation as a platform for the dissemination of antisemitic hate speech and white supremacist ideology. These principles can be seen as typifying the free speech absolutism which became dominant within the US tech industry during the 1990s. However, the right to free expression cannot reasonably be taken to exempt internet companies from responsibility for content whose publication they facilitate.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-34 |
Journal | Journal of Contemporary Antisemitism |
Volume | 3 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 19 Dec 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 19 Dec 2020 |