Applying the lens of science capital to understand learner engagement in informal maker spaces.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Opportunities for young people to participate in making activities—either within school-based learning or within the growing number of makerspaces being established outside of formal education—have increased dramatically in recent years. Whilst some have advocated young people’s participation in makerspaces as an opportunity to democratise access to STEM learning, it is also acknowledged that these spaces reproduce patterns of inequitable participation found in other science-related settings. An underpinning framework that builds on the concept of science capital and the principles of the science capital teaching approach may help a better understanding of this issue. Drawing on data from observations and interviews conducted in a UK-based makerspace, we argue that science capital pedagogic principles are evident in makerspaces and, when enacted, help to create an environment where young people feel valued and better able to participate in making and coding activities. We argue that small changes to practice in the design and facilitation of makerspaces could result in such spaces being more equitable and socially just.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLecture Notes in Educational Technology
Subtitle of host publicationSpringer Lecture Notes in Educational Technology Series
EditorsMichail Giannakos
PublisherSpringer
Pages15-31
Number of pages17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Educational Technology
ISSN (Print)2196-4963
ISSN (Electronic)2196-4971

Keywords

  • Coding
  • Equity
  • Facilitators
  • Makerspaces
  • Making
  • STEM
  • Science capital
  • Science capital teaching approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Applying the lens of science capital to understand learner engagement in informal maker spaces.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this