Argument schemes for reasoning about trust

Simon Parsons*, Katie Atkinson, Zimi Li, Peter McBurney, Elizabeth Sklar, Munindar Singh, Karen Haigh, Karl Levitt, Jeff Rowe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trust is a natural mechanism by which an autonomous party, an agent, can deal with the inherent uncertainty regarding the behaviours of other parties and the uncertainty in the information it shares with those parties. Trust is thus crucial in any decentralised system. This paper builds on recent efforts to use argumentation to reason about trust. Specifically, a set of schemes is provided, and abstract patterns of reasoning that apply in multiple situations geared towards trust. Schemes are described in which one agent, A, can establish arguments for trusting another agent, B, directly, as well as schemes that A can use to construct arguments for trusting C, where C is trusted by B. For both sets of schemes, a set of critical questions is offered that identify the situations in which these schemes can fail.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-190
Number of pages31
JournalArgument & Computation
Volume5
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 May 2014

Keywords

  • argument representation
  • formal models of argumentation
  • social influence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Argument schemes for reasoning about trust'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this