TY - JOUR
T1 - Arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse phenotype
T2 - An unsupervised machine learning analysis using a multicenter cardiac MRI registry
AU - Akyea, Ralph Kwame
AU - Figliozzi, Stefano
AU - Lopes, Pedro M.
AU - Bauer, Klemens B.
AU - Moura-Ferreira, Sara
AU - Tondi, Lara
AU - Mushtaq, Saima
AU - Censi, Stefano
AU - Pavon, Anna Giulia
AU - Bassi, Ilaria
AU - Galian-Gay, Laura
AU - Teske, Arco J.
AU - Biondi, Federico
AU - Filomena, Domenico
AU - Stylianidis, Vasileios
AU - Torlasco, Camilla
AU - Muraru, Denisa
AU - Monney, Pierre
AU - Quattrocchi, Giuseppina
AU - Maestrini, Viviana
AU - Agati, Luciano
AU - Monti, Lorenzo
AU - Pedrotti, Patrizia
AU - Vandenberk, Bert
AU - Squeri, Angelo
AU - Lombardi, Massimo
AU - Ferreira, Antonio M.
AU - Schwitter, Juerg
AU - Aquaro, Giovanni Donato
AU - Pontone, Gianluca
AU - Chiribiri, Amedeo
AU - Palomares, José F.Rodríguez
AU - Yilmaz, Ali
AU - Andreini, Daniele
AU - Florian, Anca Rezeda
AU - Francone, Marco
AU - Leiner, Tim
AU - Abecasis, João
AU - Badano, Luigi Paolo
AU - Bogaert, Jan
AU - Georgiopoulos, Georgios
AU - Masci, Pier Giorgio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2024
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - Purpose: To use unsupervised machine learning to identify phenotypic clusters with increased risk of arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with MVP without hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac MRI between October 2007 and June 2020 in 15 European tertiary centers. The study end point was a composite of sustained ventricular tachycardia, (aborted) sudden cardiac death, or unexplained syncope. Unsupervised data-driven hierarchical k-mean algorithm was utilized to identify phenotypic clusters. The association between clusters and the study end point was assessed by Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 474 patients (mean age, 47 years ± 16 [SD]; 244 female, 230 male) with two phenotypic clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 2 (199 of 474, 42%) had more severe mitral valve degeneration (ie, bileaflet MVP and leaflet displacement), left and right heart chamber remodeling, and myocardial fibrosis as assessed with LGE cardiac MRI than those in cluster 1. Demographic and clinical features (ie, symptoms, arrhythmias at Holter monitoring) had negligible contribution in differentiating the two clusters. Compared with cluster 1, the risk of developing the study end point over a median follow-up of 39 months was significantly higher in cluster 2 patients (hazard ratio: 3.79 [95% CI: 1.19, 12.12], P = .02) after adjustment for LGE extent. Conclusion: Among patients with MVP without significant mitral regurgitation or LV dysfunction, unsupervised machine learning enabled the identification of two phenotypic clusters with distinct arrhythmic outcomes based primarily on cardiac MRI features. These results encourage the use of in-depth imaging-based phenotyping for implementing arrhythmic risk prediction in MVP.
AB - Purpose: To use unsupervised machine learning to identify phenotypic clusters with increased risk of arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included patients with MVP without hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction undergoing late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac MRI between October 2007 and June 2020 in 15 European tertiary centers. The study end point was a composite of sustained ventricular tachycardia, (aborted) sudden cardiac death, or unexplained syncope. Unsupervised data-driven hierarchical k-mean algorithm was utilized to identify phenotypic clusters. The association between clusters and the study end point was assessed by Cox proportional hazards model. Results: A total of 474 patients (mean age, 47 years ± 16 [SD]; 244 female, 230 male) with two phenotypic clusters were identified. Patients in cluster 2 (199 of 474, 42%) had more severe mitral valve degeneration (ie, bileaflet MVP and leaflet displacement), left and right heart chamber remodeling, and myocardial fibrosis as assessed with LGE cardiac MRI than those in cluster 1. Demographic and clinical features (ie, symptoms, arrhythmias at Holter monitoring) had negligible contribution in differentiating the two clusters. Compared with cluster 1, the risk of developing the study end point over a median follow-up of 39 months was significantly higher in cluster 2 patients (hazard ratio: 3.79 [95% CI: 1.19, 12.12], P = .02) after adjustment for LGE extent. Conclusion: Among patients with MVP without significant mitral regurgitation or LV dysfunction, unsupervised machine learning enabled the identification of two phenotypic clusters with distinct arrhythmic outcomes based primarily on cardiac MRI features. These results encourage the use of in-depth imaging-based phenotyping for implementing arrhythmic risk prediction in MVP.
KW - Cardiac
KW - Cardiac MRI
KW - Cluster Analysis
KW - Mitral Valve Prolapse
KW - MR Imaging
KW - Sudden Cardiac Death
KW - Unsupervised Machine Learning
KW - Ventricular Arrhythmia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203260294&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/ryct.230247
DO - 10.1148/ryct.230247
M3 - Article
C2 - 38900026
SN - 2638-6135
VL - 6
JO - Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
JF - Radiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
IS - 3
M1 - e230247
ER -