Articulating Change and Responsibility: Identity, Memory, and the Use of Historical Narratives in German Parliamentary Debates on Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Maximilian Tkocz; Holger Stritzel

doi:10.1080/09644008.2023.2252765

Articulating Change and Responsibility: Identity, Memory, and the Use of Historical Narratives in German Parliamentary Debates on Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Maximilian Tkocz, Holger Stritzel

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conceptually contributing to the literature on culture/identity, ontological security, and narrative, this article explores Germany's articulation of historical memory in light of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. We argue that this is done through (re)interpretation and contestation, combing biographical continuity and narrative adjustment. Based on an analysis of 107 speeches in the German parliament, we claim that German foreign policy discourse is marked by a tension between different principles which are rooted in a normative dispute among Germans seeking to draw the ‘right lessons’ from the country's history. This dispute is exemplified by ongoing German attempts to contextualise and situate their own past within the present through political narratives.

Original language	English
Journal	German Politics
Early online date	12 Sept 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2023.2252765
Publication status	E-pub ahead of print - 12 Sept 2023

Access to Document

10.1080/09644008.2023.2252765

Cite this

@article{aaa57c3b51da4659b2c71d8d0b9f0bc9,

title = "Articulating Change and Responsibility: Identity, Memory, and the Use of Historical Narratives in German Parliamentary Debates on Russia{\textquoteright}s Invasion of Ukraine",

abstract = "Conceptually contributing to the literature on culture/identity, ontological security, and narrative, this article explores Germany's articulation of historical memory in light of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. We argue that this is done through (re)interpretation and contestation, combing biographical continuity and narrative adjustment. Based on an analysis of 107 speeches in the German parliament, we claim that German foreign policy discourse is marked by a tension between different principles which are rooted in a normative dispute among Germans seeking to draw the {\textquoteleft}right lessons{\textquoteright} from the country's history. This dispute is exemplified by ongoing German attempts to contextualise and situate their own past within the present through political narratives.",

author = "Maximilian Tkocz and Holger Stritzel",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",

year = "2023",

month = sep,

day = "12",

doi = "10.1080/09644008.2023.2252765",

language = "English",

journal = "German Politics",

issn = "0964-4008",

publisher = "Frank Cass Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Articulating Change and Responsibility: Identity, Memory, and the Use of Historical Narratives in German Parliamentary Debates on Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

AU - Tkocz, Maximilian

AU - Stritzel, Holger

PY - 2023/9/12

Y1 - 2023/9/12

N2 - Conceptually contributing to the literature on culture/identity, ontological security, and narrative, this article explores Germany's articulation of historical memory in light of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. We argue that this is done through (re)interpretation and contestation, combing biographical continuity and narrative adjustment. Based on an analysis of 107 speeches in the German parliament, we claim that German foreign policy discourse is marked by a tension between different principles which are rooted in a normative dispute among Germans seeking to draw the ‘right lessons’ from the country's history. This dispute is exemplified by ongoing German attempts to contextualise and situate their own past within the present through political narratives.

AB - Conceptually contributing to the literature on culture/identity, ontological security, and narrative, this article explores Germany's articulation of historical memory in light of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. We argue that this is done through (re)interpretation and contestation, combing biographical continuity and narrative adjustment. Based on an analysis of 107 speeches in the German parliament, we claim that German foreign policy discourse is marked by a tension between different principles which are rooted in a normative dispute among Germans seeking to draw the ‘right lessons’ from the country's history. This dispute is exemplified by ongoing German attempts to contextualise and situate their own past within the present through political narratives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170714264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09644008.2023.2252765

DO - 10.1080/09644008.2023.2252765

M3 - Article

SN - 0964-4008

JO - German Politics

JF - German Politics

ER -

Articulating Change and Responsibility: Identity, Memory, and the Use of Historical Narratives in German Parliamentary Debates on Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this