Assembly required: A microgenetic multiple case study of four students’ assemblages when learning about force

Richard Brock; Keith, S. Taber; Mike, D. Watts

doi:10.1080/09500693.2023.2269616

Assembly required: A microgenetic multiple case study of four students’ assemblages when learning about force

Richard Brock, Keith, S. Taber, Mike, D. Watts

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Some descriptions of learning represent the process as the development of organisations of elements. Various organisations have been proposed, for example, schemata and conceptual structures. Such representations assume that mental entities, such as concepts, are sufficiently stable and differentiated to be treated as units. We discuss these assumptions and propose a new term, assemblages, to refer to a person’s activation of two or more conceptual resources in a context. Methodological challenges have resulted in a lack of research that examines how assemblages are formed. This study presents data from a microgenetic, multiple case study of four 16-17-year-old students. The participants were interviewed weekly, using various probes related to forces and motion over six months. We focus on two aspects of the assembly process in our analysis. First, we report data that indicate that participants perceived the units they assembled differently from expert conceptualisations and reflect on the stability of their assemblages. Second, we discuss how participants’ expectations about the coherence of knowledge impact their assembly. We propose that future research investigates the stability and boundaries of conceptual resources and suggest teachers and researchers are cautious in assuming that data indicate a conceptual resource is stable or unitary.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-21
Journal	International Journal of Science Education
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2269616
Publication status	Published - 16 Nov 2023

Access to Document

10.1080/09500693.2023.2269616Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{80b55e18aed543f5ab84667f0502f3aa,

title = "Assembly required: A microgenetic multiple case study of four students{\textquoteright} assemblages when learning about force",

abstract = "Some descriptions of learning represent the process as the development of organisations of elements. Various organisations have been proposed, for example, schemata and conceptual structures. Such representations assume that mental entities, such as concepts, are sufficiently stable and differentiated to be treated as units. We discuss these assumptions and propose a new term, assemblages, to refer to a person{\textquoteright}s activation of two or more conceptual resources in a context. Methodological challenges have resulted in a lack of research that examines how assemblages are formed. This study presents data from a microgenetic, multiple case study of four 16-17-year-old students. The participants were interviewed weekly, using various probes related to forces and motion over six months. We focus on two aspects of the assembly process in our analysis. First, we report data that indicate that participants perceived the units they assembled differently from expert conceptualisations and reflect on the stability of their assemblages. Second, we discuss how participants{\textquoteright} expectations about the coherence of knowledge impact their assembly. We propose that future research investigates the stability and boundaries of conceptual resources and suggest teachers and researchers are cautious in assuming that data indicate a conceptual resource is stable or unitary.",

author = "Richard Brock and Taber, {Keith, S.} and Watts, {Mike, D.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",

year = "2023",

month = nov,

day = "16",

doi = "10.1080/09500693.2023.2269616",

language = "English",

pages = "1--21",

journal = "International Journal of Science Education",

issn = "0950-0693",

publisher = "Taylor Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assembly required

T2 - A microgenetic multiple case study of four students’ assemblages when learning about force

AU - Brock, Richard

AU - Taber, Keith, S.

AU - Watts, Mike, D.

PY - 2023/11/16

Y1 - 2023/11/16

N2 - Some descriptions of learning represent the process as the development of organisations of elements. Various organisations have been proposed, for example, schemata and conceptual structures. Such representations assume that mental entities, such as concepts, are sufficiently stable and differentiated to be treated as units. We discuss these assumptions and propose a new term, assemblages, to refer to a person’s activation of two or more conceptual resources in a context. Methodological challenges have resulted in a lack of research that examines how assemblages are formed. This study presents data from a microgenetic, multiple case study of four 16-17-year-old students. The participants were interviewed weekly, using various probes related to forces and motion over six months. We focus on two aspects of the assembly process in our analysis. First, we report data that indicate that participants perceived the units they assembled differently from expert conceptualisations and reflect on the stability of their assemblages. Second, we discuss how participants’ expectations about the coherence of knowledge impact their assembly. We propose that future research investigates the stability and boundaries of conceptual resources and suggest teachers and researchers are cautious in assuming that data indicate a conceptual resource is stable or unitary.

AB - Some descriptions of learning represent the process as the development of organisations of elements. Various organisations have been proposed, for example, schemata and conceptual structures. Such representations assume that mental entities, such as concepts, are sufficiently stable and differentiated to be treated as units. We discuss these assumptions and propose a new term, assemblages, to refer to a person’s activation of two or more conceptual resources in a context. Methodological challenges have resulted in a lack of research that examines how assemblages are formed. This study presents data from a microgenetic, multiple case study of four 16-17-year-old students. The participants were interviewed weekly, using various probes related to forces and motion over six months. We focus on two aspects of the assembly process in our analysis. First, we report data that indicate that participants perceived the units they assembled differently from expert conceptualisations and reflect on the stability of their assemblages. Second, we discuss how participants’ expectations about the coherence of knowledge impact their assembly. We propose that future research investigates the stability and boundaries of conceptual resources and suggest teachers and researchers are cautious in assuming that data indicate a conceptual resource is stable or unitary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85176931812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500693.2023.2269616

DO - 10.1080/09500693.2023.2269616

M3 - Article

SN - 0950-0693

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - International Journal of Science Education

JF - International Journal of Science Education

ER -

Assembly required: A microgenetic multiple case study of four students’ assemblages when learning about force

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this