Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus

Cristiana Vitale, Emmanuelle Berthelot, Andrew J S Coats, Hill Loreena, Nancy M Albert, Michal Tkaczyszyn, Stamatis Adamopoulos, Lisa Anderson, Markus S Anker, Stefan D Anker, Derek Bell, Tuvia Ben-Gal, Vasiliki Bistola, Biykem Bozkurt, Poppy Brooks, Miguel Camafort, Juan Jesus Carrero, Ovidiu Chioncel, Dong-Ju Choi, Wook-Jin ChungWolfram Doehner, Daniel Fernández-Bergés, Roberto Ferrari, Mona Fiuzat, Juan Esteban Gomez-Mesa, Finn Gustafsson, Ewa Jankowska, Seok-Min Kang, Koichiro Kinugawa, Kamlesh Khunti, F D Richard Hobbs, Christopher Lee, Yuri Lopatin, Matthew Maddocks, Giuseppe Maltese, Elena Marques-Sule, Yuya Matsue, Òscar Miró, Brenda Moura, Massimo Piepoli, Piotr Ponikowski, Giovanni Pulignano, Amina Rakisheva, Robin Ray, Angela Sciacqua, Petar Seferovic, Trinidad Sentandreu-Mañó, Shirley Sze, Alan Sinclair, Anna Strömberg, Olga Theou, Hiroyuki Tsutsui, Izabella Uchmanowicz, Maria Teresa Vidan, Maurizio Volterrani, Stephan von Haehling, Byungsu Yoo, Jian Zhang, Yuhui Zhang, Marco Metra, Giuseppe Massimo Claudio Rosano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

AIMS: The Heart Failure Frailty Score (HFFS) is a novel, multidimensional tool to assess frailty in patients with heart failure (HF). It has been developed to overcome limitations of existing frailty assessment tools while being practical for clinical use. The HFFS reflects the concept of frailty as a multidimensional, dynamic and potentially reversible state, which increases vulnerability to stressors and risk of poor outcomes in patients with HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS: The HFFS was developed through a Delphi consensus process involving 54 international experts. This approach involved iterative rounds of questionnaires and interviews, where a panel of experts provided their opinions on specific questions prepared by the Steering Committee. The experts were invited to vote and share their views anonymously, using a 5-point Likert scale over iterative rounds. An 80% threshold was set for agreement or disagreement for each statement. Twenty-two variables from four domains (clinical, functional, psycho-cognitive and social) have been selected for inclusion in the HFFS after the third round of the Delphi process. A shorter version (S-HFFS), including 10 variables, has also been developed for daily clinical use.

CONCLUSIONS: The HFFS is a new multidimensional tool for the identification of frailty in patients with HF. It should also enables healthcare providers to identify potential 'red flags' for frailty in order to develop personalized care plans. The next step will be to validate the new score in patients with HF.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1818-1831
Number of pages14
JournalESC Heart Failure
Volume12
Issue number3
Early online date4 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Humans
  • Heart Failure/complications
  • Frailty/diagnosis
  • Delphi Technique
  • Consensus
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Aged
  • Male
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment/methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessment of frailty in patients with heart failure: A new Heart Failure Frailty Score developed by Delphi consensus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this