Assessment of suitable designs for field experiments involving airborne diseases

V. Solórzano; S. G. Gilmour; K. Phelps; R. Kennedy

doi:10.1017/S0021859697004826

Assessment of suitable designs for field experiments involving airborne diseases

V. Solórzano, S. G. Gilmour^*, K. Phelps, R. Kennedy

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The suitability was assessed of various designs for field experiments investigating plant diseases caused by airborne pathogens that can be subject to interplot interference. Use of a model to describe such interference showed that the treatments with the most dissimilar effects on controlling the disease should be allocated to experimental plots furthest apart in each block, in order to minimize the interplot interference within a block. When using large square plots, rectangular blocks were more efficient than square blocks in minimizing treatment-comparison biases due to interference between neighbours. For rectangular blocks with the square plots side by side, less biased treatment comparisons were obtained from designs with complete blocks than from designs with incomplete blocks, especially when larger numbers of treatments were included in the experiment. However, when interplot variance is taken into account, incomplete blocks may give better treatment comparisons. Similarly, unbalanced designs composed only of incomplete blocks that yield less biased treatment comparisons may be better than balanced incomplete block designs when interplot variance is low. For high levels of variation, balanced incomplete block designs may be more appropriate, as increasing the precision of the treatment comparisons becomes more important than reducing the bias.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	249-256
Number of pages	8
Journal	JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
Volume	129
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859697004826
Publication status	Published - Nov 1997

Access to Document

10.1017/S0021859697004826

Cite this

@article{2b330fb8a24f4fa9a630c550420d821b,

title = "Assessment of suitable designs for field experiments involving airborne diseases",

abstract = "The suitability was assessed of various designs for field experiments investigating plant diseases caused by airborne pathogens that can be subject to interplot interference. Use of a model to describe such interference showed that the treatments with the most dissimilar effects on controlling the disease should be allocated to experimental plots furthest apart in each block, in order to minimize the interplot interference within a block. When using large square plots, rectangular blocks were more efficient than square blocks in minimizing treatment-comparison biases due to interference between neighbours. For rectangular blocks with the square plots side by side, less biased treatment comparisons were obtained from designs with complete blocks than from designs with incomplete blocks, especially when larger numbers of treatments were included in the experiment. However, when interplot variance is taken into account, incomplete blocks may give better treatment comparisons. Similarly, unbalanced designs composed only of incomplete blocks that yield less biased treatment comparisons may be better than balanced incomplete block designs when interplot variance is low. For high levels of variation, balanced incomplete block designs may be more appropriate, as increasing the precision of the treatment comparisons becomes more important than reducing the bias.",

author = "V. Sol{\'o}rzano and Gilmour, {S. G.} and K. Phelps and R. Kennedy",

year = "1997",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1017/S0021859697004826",

language = "English",

volume = "129",

pages = "249--256",

journal = "JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE",

issn = "0021-8596",

publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of suitable designs for field experiments involving airborne diseases

AU - Solórzano, V.

AU - Gilmour, S. G.

AU - Phelps, K.

AU - Kennedy, R.

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - The suitability was assessed of various designs for field experiments investigating plant diseases caused by airborne pathogens that can be subject to interplot interference. Use of a model to describe such interference showed that the treatments with the most dissimilar effects on controlling the disease should be allocated to experimental plots furthest apart in each block, in order to minimize the interplot interference within a block. When using large square plots, rectangular blocks were more efficient than square blocks in minimizing treatment-comparison biases due to interference between neighbours. For rectangular blocks with the square plots side by side, less biased treatment comparisons were obtained from designs with complete blocks than from designs with incomplete blocks, especially when larger numbers of treatments were included in the experiment. However, when interplot variance is taken into account, incomplete blocks may give better treatment comparisons. Similarly, unbalanced designs composed only of incomplete blocks that yield less biased treatment comparisons may be better than balanced incomplete block designs when interplot variance is low. For high levels of variation, balanced incomplete block designs may be more appropriate, as increasing the precision of the treatment comparisons becomes more important than reducing the bias.

AB - The suitability was assessed of various designs for field experiments investigating plant diseases caused by airborne pathogens that can be subject to interplot interference. Use of a model to describe such interference showed that the treatments with the most dissimilar effects on controlling the disease should be allocated to experimental plots furthest apart in each block, in order to minimize the interplot interference within a block. When using large square plots, rectangular blocks were more efficient than square blocks in minimizing treatment-comparison biases due to interference between neighbours. For rectangular blocks with the square plots side by side, less biased treatment comparisons were obtained from designs with complete blocks than from designs with incomplete blocks, especially when larger numbers of treatments were included in the experiment. However, when interplot variance is taken into account, incomplete blocks may give better treatment comparisons. Similarly, unbalanced designs composed only of incomplete blocks that yield less biased treatment comparisons may be better than balanced incomplete block designs when interplot variance is low. For high levels of variation, balanced incomplete block designs may be more appropriate, as increasing the precision of the treatment comparisons becomes more important than reducing the bias.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1842289847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0021859697004826

DO - 10.1017/S0021859697004826

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:1842289847

SN - 0021-8596

VL - 129

SP - 249

EP - 256

JO - JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE

JF - JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE

IS - 3

ER -

Assessment of suitable designs for field experiments involving airborne diseases

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this