TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of Ventilatory Heterogeneity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using the Inspired Sinewave Test
AU - Bruce, Richard
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was funded by Department of Health, National Institute for Health Research (Grant Number: II-LA-0214-20005).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Bruce et al.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: There is marked variability in the symptoms and outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which are poorly predicted by spirometry/FEV
1%pred. Furthermore, as spirometry requires the performance of potentially distressing respiratory manoeuvres which are to some extent user-effort dependent, there is need for non-invasive and simple-to-perform techniques to identify subtypes of COPD which are more closely related to clinically relevant outcomes. Materials and Methods: The inspired sinewave test (IST) sinusoidally modulates the inspired concentration of a tracer gas (N
2O) over successive tidal breaths. A singlecompartment tidal-ventilation lung model processes the amplitude/phase of the expired N
2 O sinewave and estimates cardiopulmonary variables including: effective lung volume and indices of ventilatory heterogeneity (VH; ELV
180/FRC
pleth and ELV
180/ELV
pred). 83 COPD patients and 53 healthy controls performed the IST test, standard pulmonary function tests (Spirometry, body plethysmography and the single breath test of carbon monoxide uptake), and symptom severity questionnaires (COPD assessment test, CAT; mMRC dyspnoea-scale, mMRC-DS; Cough+Mucus score; C+M score). Results: ELV
180/FRC
pleth and ELV
180/ELV
pred were significantly lower in patients with COPD vs healthy participants (0.34±0.11 vs 0.68±0.14 and 0.7±0.27 vs 0.98±0.15, respectively; P<0.05). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that ELV
180/FRC
pleth was a stronger and independent predictor of CAT, mMRC-DS and C+M score vs FEV
1%pred. ELV
180/ELV
pred was a stronger and independent and better predictor of C+M score vs FEV
1%pred. Phenotyping patients, based upon ELV
180/ELV
pred and FRC
%pred, uncovered significant symptomatic differences between groups. Conclusion: The IST indices of VH were superior and independent predictors of symptom severity vs FEV
1%pred and has potential as a non-invasive and simple-to-perform method to stratify patients into subgroups related to clinically relevant features of COPD.
AB - Background: There is marked variability in the symptoms and outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which are poorly predicted by spirometry/FEV
1%pred. Furthermore, as spirometry requires the performance of potentially distressing respiratory manoeuvres which are to some extent user-effort dependent, there is need for non-invasive and simple-to-perform techniques to identify subtypes of COPD which are more closely related to clinically relevant outcomes. Materials and Methods: The inspired sinewave test (IST) sinusoidally modulates the inspired concentration of a tracer gas (N
2O) over successive tidal breaths. A singlecompartment tidal-ventilation lung model processes the amplitude/phase of the expired N
2 O sinewave and estimates cardiopulmonary variables including: effective lung volume and indices of ventilatory heterogeneity (VH; ELV
180/FRC
pleth and ELV
180/ELV
pred). 83 COPD patients and 53 healthy controls performed the IST test, standard pulmonary function tests (Spirometry, body plethysmography and the single breath test of carbon monoxide uptake), and symptom severity questionnaires (COPD assessment test, CAT; mMRC dyspnoea-scale, mMRC-DS; Cough+Mucus score; C+M score). Results: ELV
180/FRC
pleth and ELV
180/ELV
pred were significantly lower in patients with COPD vs healthy participants (0.34±0.11 vs 0.68±0.14 and 0.7±0.27 vs 0.98±0.15, respectively; P<0.05). Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that ELV
180/FRC
pleth was a stronger and independent predictor of CAT, mMRC-DS and C+M score vs FEV
1%pred. ELV
180/ELV
pred was a stronger and independent and better predictor of C+M score vs FEV
1%pred. Phenotyping patients, based upon ELV
180/ELV
pred and FRC
%pred, uncovered significant symptomatic differences between groups. Conclusion: The IST indices of VH were superior and independent predictors of symptom severity vs FEV
1%pred and has potential as a non-invasive and simple-to-perform method to stratify patients into subgroups related to clinically relevant features of COPD.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102325480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2147/COPD.S264360
DO - 10.2147/COPD.S264360
M3 - Article
SN - 1176-9106
VL - 16
SP - 401
EP - 413
JO - International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
JF - International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ER -