Abstract
Recent research suggests that cue competition effects in human contingency learning, such as blocking, are due to higher-order cognitive processes. Moreover, some experimental reports suggest that the effect opposite to blocking, augmentation, could occur in experimental preparations that preclude the intervention of reasoning mechanisms. In the present research, we tested this hypothesis by investigating cue interaction effects in an experimental task in which participants had to enter their responses under time pressure. The results show that under these conditions, augmentation, instead of blocking, is observed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 579-589 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | British Journal of Psychology |
| Volume | 101 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2010 |
Keywords
- CAUSAL JUDGMENT
- CUE COMPETITION
- OUTCOME CONTINGENCY
- BLOCKING
- DISCRIMINATION
- DISSOCIATION
- POTENTIATION
- ATTRIBUTION
- PREDICTIONS
- PERFORMANCE
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Augmentation in contingency learning under time pressure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver