Author Correction: Effects of route of administration on oxytocin-induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow in humans (Nature Communications, (2020), 11, 1, (1160), 10.1038/s41467-020-14845-5)

TY - JOUR

T1 - Author Correction

T2 - Effects of route of administration on oxytocin-induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow in humans (Nature Communications, (2020), 11, 1, (1160), 10.1038/s41467-020-14845-5)

AU - Martins, D A

AU - Mazibuko, N

AU - Zelaya, F

AU - Vasilakopoulou, S

AU - Loveridge, J

AU - Oates, A

AU - Maltezos, S

AU - Mehta, M

AU - Wastling, S

AU - Howard, M

AU - McAlonan, G

AU - Murphy, D

AU - Williams, S C R

AU - Fotopoulou, A

AU - Schuschnig, U

AU - Paloyelis, Y

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2022.

PY - 2022/3/31

Y1 - 2022/3/31

N2 - In the original version of this Article, there was an error in the calculations of the areas under the curve (AUCs), which systematically overestimated the AUCs for the three methods of oxytocin administration. As a result, Fig. 5, Fig. 6B and C, and Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3, and a part of the Results section, contained errors. Repeating all analyses with the correctly calculated AUCs did not change the pattern of results or the conclusions of the analyses. Below are the revised versions of all Results, Figures and Tables where the error in the AUC calculations could have affected the results. The original version of this Article contained errors in the Results subsection titled ‘Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles among treatments’, in which a section of text incorrectly read.

AB - In the original version of this Article, there was an error in the calculations of the areas under the curve (AUCs), which systematically overestimated the AUCs for the three methods of oxytocin administration. As a result, Fig. 5, Fig. 6B and C, and Supplementary Table 2 and Supplementary Table 3, and a part of the Results section, contained errors. Repeating all analyses with the correctly calculated AUCs did not change the pattern of results or the conclusions of the analyses. Below are the revised versions of all Results, Figures and Tables where the error in the AUC calculations could have affected the results. The original version of this Article contained errors in the Results subsection titled ‘Comparison of pharmacokinetic profiles among treatments’, in which a section of text incorrectly read.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127388729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41467-022-29419-w

DO - 10.1038/s41467-022-29419-w

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 35361784

SN - 2041-1723

VL - 13

SP - 1876

JO - Nature Communications

JF - Nature Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 1876

ER -