Author's Response to Peer Commentaries: Mexico's rule of law and MRTs

Cesar Palacios-Gonzalez; María de Jesús Medina-Arellano

doi:10.1093/jlb/lsx031

King's College London

King's main site

Research portal

Author's Response to Peer Commentaries: Mexico's rule of law and MRTs

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

Cesar Palacios-Gonzalez, María de Jesús Medina-Arellano

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1-7
Journal	The Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Early online date	13 Oct 2017
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsx031
Accepted/In press	22 Aug 2017
E-pub ahead of print	13 Oct 2017

Documents

Author's Response to Peer_GONZALEZ_Publishedonline13October2017_GOLD VoR (CC By-NC-ND)
lsx031_3.pdf, 243 KB, application/pdf
Uploaded date:13 Oct 2017
Version:Final published version
Licence:CC BY-NC-ND

King's Authors

Cesar Palacios-Gonzalez (Laws)

Abstract

We would like to thank Rebecca Dimond and Atina Krajewska, Sandra González-Santos, and Tetsuya Ishii for their thoughtful comments on our article. Here we will reply to their comments while at the same time we provide further clarificatory notes regarding what transpired in Mexico, in relation to the use of mitochondrial replacement techniques (MRTs).

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

King's College London - Homepage

Author's Response to Peer Commentaries: Mexico's rule of law and MRTs

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Download statistics

By the same authors

With some of the same researchers

From the same journal