Automatic assessment of volume asymmetries applied to hip abductor muscles in patients with hip arthroplasty

Christian Klemt, Marc Modat, Jonas Pichat, M. J. Cardoso, Joahnn Henckel, Alister Hart, Sebastien Ourselin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties have been utilised over the last 15 years to restore hip function for 1.5 million patients worldwide. Althoug widely used, this hip arthroplasty releases metal wear debris which lead to muscle atrophy. The degree of muscle wastage differs across patients ranging from mild to severe. The longterm outcomes for patients with MoM hip arthroplasty are reduced for increasing degrees of muscle atrophy, highlighting the need to automatically segment pathological muscles. The automated segmentation of pathological soft tissues is challenging as these lack distinct boundaries and morphologically differ across subjects. As a result, there is no method reported in the literature which has been successfully applied to automatically segment pathological muscles. We propose the first automated framework to delineate severely atrophied muscles by applying a novel automated segmentation propagation framework to patients with MoM hip arthroplasty. The proposed algorithm was used to automatically quantify muscle wastage in these patients.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedical Imaging 2015
Subtitle of host publicationImage Processing
PublisherSPIE
Volume9413
ISBN (Electronic)9781628415032
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015
EventMedical Imaging 2015: Image Processing - Orlando, United States
Duration: 24 Feb 201526 Feb 2015

Conference

ConferenceMedical Imaging 2015: Image Processing
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityOrlando
Period24/02/201526/02/2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automatic assessment of volume asymmetries applied to hip abductor muscles in patients with hip arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this