Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
Martin J. Connor, Prokar Dasgupta, Hashim U. Ahmed, Asif Raza
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 643-649 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Nature Reviews Urology |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Accepted/In press | 1 Jan 2020 |
Published | 1 Nov 2020 |
Additional links |
Despite advances in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in the past two decades, control of the robotic system currently remains under the command of a human surgeon. Historically, urology has pioneered new surgical techniques and technologies. Now, autonomous RAS is on the horizon and the first data from clinical trials of autonomous RAS in urology are being published. Automation takes control away from the surgeon but promises standardization of techniques, increased efficiency, potentially reduced complication rates and new ways of integrating intra-operative imaging. Preclinical and clinical evidence is emerging that supports the use of autonomous robotic-assisted urological surgery. Use of autonomous technologies in the operating theatre will directly affect the role of the urological surgeon. Integration of autonomous RAS can be viewed as a positive aid, but it might also be perceived as a threat to the future urological surgeon.
King's College London - Homepage
© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454