Backing what works? Social Impact Bonds and evidence-informed policy and practice

Alec Fraser, Stefanie Tan, Annette Boaz, Nicholas Mays

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
110 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social Impact Bonds (SIBs) offer an opportunity to explore the use of evidence to inform public policy and commissioning decisions in both discursive and practical terms in what are frequently highly politicized contexts. We identify three potential mechanisms by which SIBs may promote evidence use and explore these through empirical findings drawn from a three-year evaluation of SIBs applied to health and social care in the English NHS. IMPACT: This paper highlights three mechanisms by which SIBs may encourage evidence-informed policy-making. First, the ability of SIB financing to promote specific interventions for which a positive evidence base already exists. Second, the opportunities that SIB-financed programmes offer for the promotion of evidence use through improved local data collection practices. Third, the opportunities that SIB-financed interventions offer for formal evaluation. The authors tested these mechanisms; the implications of the results for policy-makers, public managers and other interested parties are presented in the paper.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)195-204
Number of pages10
JournalPUBLIC MONEY AND MANAGEMENT
Volume40
Issue number3
Early online date3 Feb 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Apr 2020

Keywords

  • Evaluation
  • evidence-informed policy
  • NHS
  • outcomes-based contracting
  • payment for performance
  • Social Impact Bonds (SIBs)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Backing what works? Social Impact Bonds and evidence-informed policy and practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this