King's College London

Research portal

Bacterial Contamination of Endodontic Materials before and after Clinical Storage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1852-1856
Number of pages5
JournalJOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume43
Issue number11
Early online date23 Sep 2017
DOIs
Accepted/In press20 Sep 2017
E-pub ahead of print23 Sep 2017
PublishedNov 2017

Documents

King's Authors

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate the bacterial contamination in endodontic consumables (gutta-percha points, rubber dams, paper mixing pads, caulking agents, and endodontic instrument sponges [EISs]) before and after clinical use and storage. Methods Materials were randomly sampled in triplicates at 3 time points (t0, at package opening; t1, at 7 days; and t2, at 14 days) during their clinical usage. The gutta-percha points and caulking agent (25 mg) were added to 1 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The rubber dam, paper mixing pad, and EIS were added to 25 mL PBS. After vortexing, centrifuging, and removing the supernatant, the pellet was resuspended in 1 mL PBS, plated on fastidious anaerobic agar, and incubated aerobically and anaerobically. The grown colonies were identified by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). The total bacterial load was calculated in the remaining volume (800 μL) from each sample by quantitative polymerase chain reaction after DNA extraction. Results All tested materials showed a varied number of contaminated samples at the 3 time points (except EIS at t0) using MALDI-TOF MS. The most isolated genera were Propionibacterium (42%) and Staphylococcus (32%). By using non–culture-based approaches, all tested materials at the 3 time points (except gutta-percha at t0 and the caulking agent at t0, t1, and t2) carried bacterial DNA. Conclusions The majority of the tested materials harbored bacteria in their samples before and after clinical storage. Nosocomial infection derived from commonly used consumables could have an impact on the outcome of endodontic treatment.

Download statistics

No data available

View graph of relations

© 2020 King's College London | Strand | London WC2R 2LS | England | United Kingdom | Tel +44 (0)20 7836 5454